Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / May 2006

One would need only one and only one
source-clock to instate an official time all over an
inertial reference frame, even if only signals of a
limited speed c are available, as in other places of

     Is the time a relative size?
   Many people believe that the time is a relative size. Is it so?
   From the Lorentz transformation are deduced the following relations
about the time:

"tomgee" <tyropress@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1147495981.587144.180180@d71g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Violation of Bell's inequality leads to 2 conclusions:
1. "Action-at-a-distance" is a part of reality. It is faster than
light.
2. Local hidden-variable theories are not possible.

"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
    Cosmological observations have recently indicated that the "expansion"
of the universe to be faster at extreme distances than it is over most of
its observable volume. There have been attempts to reconcile ...

i have an idea for the curvedness of the universe in one respect and
the flatness of the universe in another respect ,but both are
complementry .
there is a single entityn , you may this a space ,which has two aspects

"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
    Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr.
Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference frames. It
was his contention that the force produced by a gravitational field could be

Some people are spending very much efford in their attempt to argue for an
absolute space. That should be clear for readers of SPR
(Science.Physics.Relativity). However, most arguments attack the 'apperent
absurdity' of the relativitve space.

For some time now I have been interested in if gauge symmetry actually
implies Maxwell's Equations.  I have read claims it does but have not seen
the derivation.  Well it being Easter I decided to splurge and purchase one
of the articles that claims it can be done.  So I ...

Hi. I hope this is the right place to post this.
Over the course of a human lifetime of, say 70 years, what would you
estimate as a reasonable upper bound for the difference in ageing of two
twins? Say one is an airline pilot for thirty years, or maybe even an

"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
    Dr. Einstein is credited with being a modern Newton who provided a sea
change shift in our understanding of physical reality. He is credited with
this accomplishment by virtue of his Special Theory of Relativity (1905)

Now if "I" say it, of course it will have no validity especially with
the likes of the French Belgium Bilge around. Therefore here it is
straight from the Lions mouth, Hawkings himself:
http://www.physics.metu.edu.tr/~fizikt/html/hawking/f.html

Most of the relativity articles in Wikipedia seem to have
been taken over by varying degrees of crackpottery.  I
guess the crackpots are more persistent.  Is there a
solution?

ABRA CADABRA, Simply adding velocity shall make this BOX (Mass) way
LESS?
On the airless moon, 100kg Einstein is placed in a BOX with two balls,
each ball is 20kg (total weight of the BOX = 140kg).

A patent application: http://tinyurl.com/ebu6t
--
Jan Bielawski