| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| English Translation of Ritz' 1908 Work (for John Kennaugh) | 31 Jul 2006 12:18 GMT | 1 |
http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/crit/1908a.htm Vern
|
| The phrase 'dark matter' | 30 Jul 2006 20:10 GMT | 56 |
Does anyone know when and by whom the phrase 'dark matter' was first coined? Stephen
|
| Scientific proof of God is possible. | 30 Jul 2006 18:29 GMT | 4 |
Creating all MATERIAL WORLD the God could only working in an absolute reference system and only under physical and mathematical laws. ========================
|
| Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe? | 30 Jul 2006 15:38 GMT | 26 |
Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory of Everything, etc, which I understand have not been developed yet, but I am wondering if there exists a theory or mathematical formula that
|
| COLLIDER FOLLY | 30 Jul 2006 03:52 GMT | 3 |
Collider Folly Recall New Year, 2000? Everybody was excited about the arrival of "the new millennium". Advertising on TV was full of it, so was radio and the print media as well as the general populace. "The new
|
| THE MODERN PHYSICIST | 30 Jul 2006 00:38 GMT | 10 |
I've been doing more thinking about the so-called modern physicists, especially the mental weaklings on this news group. I'm no psychologist - but nonetheless I can figure out fairly well their problem.
|
| A Million Miles a Day | 29 Jul 2006 22:40 GMT | 2 |
Galaxy Song - Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life": Whenever life gets you down Mrs. Brown, And things seem hard or tough,
|
| SR F.O.P.I | 29 Jul 2006 05:21 GMT | 20 |
SR F.O.P.I. Two men on the planet Superstition wondered about the nature of light. How was it transmitted from its sources? To answer their curiosity, they used a device called interferometer in an experiment which later
|
| Understanding quantum mechnanics | 29 Jul 2006 01:14 GMT | 3 |
Understanding quantum mechnanics IF ALL STATES OF TIME ARE REVERSED isn't there a QUNATIATIVE state of TIME that NO MATTER WHAT IS CHANGED THE EVENT STILL TOOK PLACE. With true qunatium choas of time Like a GRID OF INFINITE time sphere's
|
| "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe" | 28 Jul 2006 02:17 GMT | 1 |
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe" The basic tenet of both Special and General Relativity is that the laws and constants of the Science of Physics are the same within all velocity
|
| A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity | 27 Jul 2006 09:45 GMT | 9 |
Worth reading: Apeiron, Vol. 13, No. 3, July 2006 391 http://redshift.vif.com/current_issue.htm Or http://perso.orange.fr/mluttgens/
|
| "The Properties of the Aether" | 26 Jul 2006 16:25 GMT | 2 |
"The Properties of the Aether" Of course there is no such thing as the Aether, it says so right here in the book that the Aether has been proven not to exist. Unfortunately for the academic elite, such a proof does not exist. As Dr. Einstein said,
|
| Censorship of chronological violations | 26 Jul 2006 02:46 GMT | 1 |
Rich non-arbitrary topological change may occur in a relativistic vacuum space-time that violates chronology at every point, such that every closed timelike curve (CTC) is ``censored" by passing through a wormhole's event horizon. A Cauchy-like surface may exist through which
|
| "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2" | 25 Jul 2006 15:46 GMT | 1 |
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2" Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr. Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference frames. It was his contention that the force produced by a gravitational field could be
|
| P = m*V = (E/c,p) ? | 25 Jul 2006 12:32 GMT | 10 |
P [4-vector] = m*V [4-vector] = (E/c,p [3-vector] ) Does this always apply? I just wonder, because I've seen the P (momentum 4-vector) defined in both different ways. Maybe the relation m*V = (E/c,p) always holds, if
|