| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c" | 17 Jul 2006 02:45 GMT | 6 |
Horizon: 1. the line or circle that forms the apparent boundary between earth and sky. 2. [Astron.] a. the small circle of the celestial sphere whose plane is tangent to the earth at the position of a given observer, or the plane of such a circle ([sensible horizon]). b. the ...
|
| Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy) | 16 Jul 2006 14:08 GMT | 7 |
I tried two different ways to include a potential energy (E_pot) in the total energy: 1) E = gamma*(m_0+E_pot/c^2)*c^2 = gamma*m_0*c^2 + gamma*E_pot 2) E = gamma*m_0*c^2 + E_pot
|
| derivation of kinetic energy | 16 Jul 2006 13:27 GMT | 8 |
can anyone show me the process of getting equation (2) from equation (1). (1) D(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5) (2) m(1 - v^2/c^2)^-1.5 Dv
|
| tha still wrongness of relativity | 15 Jul 2006 22:11 GMT | 6 |
consider that one could see so small as he wold wish i mean, the sensor on retine wold be so sensitive that he culd sense distinctinsion of picometrical order if i take a composite materiale then i could see withot
|
| Is there Pions in the nucleus?? | 15 Jul 2006 16:22 GMT | 11 |
I couldn't find the specific interaction of Pions in a nucleus (only that they represent the strong nuclear binding force). I believe I read that Pions have a very short lifespan of fractions of a second and are made of quarks?
|
| How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ?? | 15 Jul 2006 08:50 GMT | 5 |
Splitting a Nucleus versus Splitting a Neutron or a Proton or a Quark or a Pion: How much more Energy(Destruction) woud a Nucleon (or Quark? or Pion?) Bomb produce over a Nuclear Fission/Fusion Bomb?? (Perhaps in GeV
|
| How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances? | 15 Jul 2006 08:32 GMT | 6 |
How do they know the binding force between quarks is weaker at shorter distances? Even though quarks must reside at a specific distance from each other, so do electrons in atomic shells and it doesn't mean if the electron is
|
| The truth about dark matter. | 15 Jul 2006 05:52 GMT | 60 |
If you don't know what dark matter is already your in for a surprise, and if you think you know what it is get ready to change your mind. Dark matter is the quantum physics of cosmology and it only occurs within the relativity of space. Space is relative as well as time and
|
| THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!! | 13 Jul 2006 14:45 GMT | 29 |
On this wonderful night of July, I just felt like shouting this great truth. Show us one or shut up.
|
| Mass | 12 Jul 2006 07:13 GMT | 24 |
If we could see things close enough, we would find out that in reality there are no small particles, no spherical objects, that could be touched. That is how we usually think of a particle. But we could see an accelerating motion of space in a small size. That acceleration is ...
|
| Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B? | 12 Jul 2006 00:40 GMT | 9 |
Abstract: General relativity predicts a "hyperfine" precession rate for a gyroscope moving in the gravitomagnetic field of a rotating massive body. The recently launched Gravity
|
| GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims | 12 Jul 2006 00:21 GMT | 225 |
GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims "In the GPS, all atomic clocks in all reference frames (in orbit and on the ground) are set once and stay synchronized. However, initial expectations based on special relativity were that
|
| Open season on crackpots | 11 Jul 2006 15:17 GMT | 11 |
This guy, Ajay Sharma is about to have a real piece of work published in Physics Essays. It is pompously entitled "100 Years of E=Mc2" and it allegedle "completes" the "incomplete work of Einstein.
|
| Where is the flaw? | 11 Jul 2006 07:53 GMT | 96 |
This post is really a follow-up to another post a few months ago: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/31732ed2 83f482d5/c72b57a46f96a9b2?lnk=st&q=cafeinst+relativity&rnum=2&hl=en#c72b57a46f96 a9b2 See http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/"TwinParadox" ...
|
| MASS OF THE PHOTON | 11 Jul 2006 06:55 GMT | 114 |
Vert wrote:
> I hereby offer a challenge to anyone competent to prove to me that the > photon has no mass. TOM ROBERTS
|