Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The Meaning Of Horizon, Including "c"17 Jul 2006 02:45 GMT6
Horizon: 1. the line or circle that forms the apparent boundary between
earth and sky. 2. [Astron.] a. the small circle of the celestial sphere
whose plane is tangent to the earth at the position of a given observer, or
the plane of such a circle ([sensible horizon]). b. the ...
Total energy: E = gamma*m*c^2 (including potential energy)16 Jul 2006 14:08 GMT7
I tried two different ways to include a potential energy (E_pot) in the
total energy:
1) E = gamma*(m_0+E_pot/c^2)*c^2 = gamma*m_0*c^2 + gamma*E_pot
2) E = gamma*m_0*c^2 + E_pot
derivation of kinetic energy16 Jul 2006 13:27 GMT8
can anyone show me the process of getting equation (2) from equation
(1).
(1) D(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5)
(2) m(1 - v^2/c^2)^-1.5 Dv
tha still wrongness of relativity15 Jul 2006 22:11 GMT6
consider that one could see so small as he wold wish
i mean, the sensor on retine wold be so sensitive that
he culd sense distinctinsion of picometrical order
if i take a composite materiale then  i could see withot
Is there Pions in the nucleus??15 Jul 2006 16:22 GMT11
I couldn't find the specific interaction of Pions in a nucleus (only
that they represent the strong nuclear binding force).
I believe I read that Pions have a very short lifespan of fractions of
a second and are made of quarks?
How much MORE destructive would be a ***NUCLEON*** BOMB ??15 Jul 2006 08:50 GMT5
Splitting a Nucleus versus Splitting a Neutron or a Proton or a Quark
or a Pion:
How much more Energy(Destruction) woud a Nucleon (or Quark? or Pion?)
Bomb produce over a Nuclear Fission/Fusion Bomb?? (Perhaps in GeV
How do they know the quark's binding force is weaker at shorter distances?15 Jul 2006 08:32 GMT6
How do they know the binding force between quarks is weaker at shorter
distances?
Even though quarks must reside at a specific distance from each other,
so do electrons in atomic shells and it doesn't mean if the electron is
The truth about dark matter.15 Jul 2006 05:52 GMT60
If you don't know what dark matter is already your in for a surprise,
and if you think you know what it is get ready to change your mind.
Dark matter is the quantum physics of cosmology and it only occurs
within the relativity of space.  Space is relative as well as time and
THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLES!!!13 Jul 2006 14:45 GMT29
On this wonderful night of July, I just felt like shouting this great
truth.
Show us one or shut up.
Mass12 Jul 2006 07:13 GMT24
If we could see things close enough, we would find out that in reality there
are no small particles, no spherical objects, that could be touched. That is
how we usually think of a particle. But we could see an accelerating motion
of space in a small size. That acceleration is ...
Which gravitomagnetic precession will be measured by Gravity Probe B?12 Jul 2006 00:40 GMT9
Abstract:
General relativity predicts a "hyperfine" precession rate
for a gyroscope moving in the gravitomagnetic field of a
rotating massive body. The recently launched Gravity
GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims12 Jul 2006 00:21 GMT225
GPS falsifies H&K experimental claims
"In the GPS, all atomic clocks in all reference frames (in orbit
and on the ground) are set once and stay synchronized.
However, initial expectations based on special relativity were that
Open season on crackpots11 Jul 2006 15:17 GMT11
This guy, Ajay Sharma is about to have a real piece of work published
in Physics Essays.
It is pompously entitled "100 Years of E=Mc2" and it allegedle
"completes" the "incomplete work of Einstein.
Where is the flaw?11 Jul 2006 07:53 GMT96
This post is really a follow-up to another post a few months ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/31732ed2
83f482d5/c72b57a46f96a9b2?lnk=st&q=cafeinst+relativity&rnum=2&hl=en#c72b57a46f96
a9b2

See http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/"TwinParadox" ...
MASS OF THE PHOTON11 Jul 2006 06:55 GMT114
Vert wrote:
> I hereby offer a challenge to anyone competent to prove to me that the
> photon has no mass.
TOM ROBERTS
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 June, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.