Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / August 2006

I will admit that most of my managers at NASA have been good to me.  My
first managers liked my style of not giving into the status quo.  This was
John Sims, Charlie Brown and Ray Dell'Osso.  Ray was the "big boss" in that
at the time he ran the training division.  I initially ...

in a book i read about the electroneuclear force.
it is written that it is the unification of weak strong and
electromagnetic forces.
and it states that this thing is done.

This has been in the news of late:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Perelman
It has been fleshed out by many since he posted it on arxiv.org.
What effects will it have on GR?

Look at my web site for new files on NASA mobbing a dissenting opinion, that
would be me BTW.
I also have a good story on what it is like to be locked in a psych ward
against your will for 2 weeks.  The summary is:

c+v and c-v or not?
Henri Poincaré wrote in his 1897 paper The Relativity of Space:
Quote.........According to a hypothesis of Lorentz and Fitzgerald, all
bodies carried forward in the earth's motion undergo a deformation.

More from Apeiron, H.A. Munera thinks that the photon has rest mass:
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V04NO2PDF/V04N2MU2.PDF

(seed = Big bang's singularity)
I proposed the limits (circumference) of space's continuum are
represented by an outer shell in two forms:
1st form: the shell expands

Roulette is a 50/50 game if you are playing black vs red, except for
the one green slip of the wheel, but the odds of hitting that are very
remote.
So here is a scam you can test out at home.

Please don't flame me just because of this 'idea'. It's true, that I'm
really thinking like this, and I would really like to hear if other
people are thinking the same way.
When talking about space-time, similar units must somehow be choosen

THE INERTIAL FORCES AND THE LAW OF THE CONSRVATION OF THE
ENERGY
Speaking about the relations that exist between the first law of the
mechanics, the principle of the relativity, the Galilei's

Please give me a direction - am I totally lost in my own world and have
spent 6 months in vain trying to figure this out, or is there a fruit
of truth hidden somewhere?
Excuse me for rapid end of some sentences and chaotic appearance of

If you are interested in learning about "Moving Dimensions Theory" take
a look at my work on the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory.  It proposes
that the Universe is a 4-D Shock Wave, thus the metric has a
Cosmological Time dependence (Cosmological Time is an Absolute Time).

There is an explanation on my site http://vps137.narod.ru/articlea.html
It was shown also that the Mickelson-Morley experiment may be treated
as the result of Galilean transformation and the way to solve the
problem of the "wave-particle dualism" is given.

Suppose we had a coordinate system on spacetime labeled u,v,w,t where t
of course is time-like, u,v,w spacelike.  Can we assert, as a matter of
convention or otherwise, that increments in t are what would be
measured by a standard clock at rest wrt the local spatial coordinates?

people talk about free energy etc, while
the most of them deny its existings
however, all the energy in the universe,
matter included (vibration of the atoms etc)