Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / September 2006

Rambus2005,
I think he'll quit if no one listens or responds.  I don't know who enjoys
this more, you or Ajay.

In response to my question about insanity (Androcles and Pentcho Valec),
someone told me to check out George Hammond.  I looked up a bunch of his
posts -- man, you were right!
Hammond's is certainly insane, but no more so than the other two. But his

Is it possible that speed of light is infinite in a flat universe, but
finite in a curved one. Imagine, in the expanding balloon analogy,
light does not follow the curvature of the surface of the ballon
(spatial dimensions), but travels on a straight tangential line in

Wow, what a wonderful thing a kill file is.  When you know a person's
comments are going to be the same, exhaustive, foul, or generally
acrimonious arguments, just kill file.  When I synchronize, looks like 20
new messages, but then, at the last moment, boom, there is only 3, the ...

There are problems enough in modern physics. If we want more problems we can
go back to classical physics. Or we can start solving those problems, but it
will be the most difficult thing to do.
http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/

Researchers say they've made an ob­ject move just by watch­ing it,
which is in­spir­ing them to a still bold­er proj­ect.
http://www.world-science.net

NEWTONIAN GRAVITY
The great physicist Isaac Newton created a mathematical model of gravity,
and it is still in use. The basic idea is that masses attract each other,
and there must be a force between them.

The replies to this post are restricted
to intelligent posters.
I'm having problems understanding Lagrange in GR.
I read articles like Dr. Reichling's "Non-symmetrical

Imagine our galaxy moving along the time axis of spacetime.
Imagine that there is some more massive object moving along the same
path,  but 1,000 years ahead.
What might happen, or be happening, to our galaxy?

Imagine the sun, moving along the time axis of spacetime.
Now imagine a tennis ball, moving along the same path, but a year
behind.
What, if anything,  might happen to the tennis ball.

Rambus2005@yahoo.com
                                             Part I
You have not put value of angle phi 89 in eq.(1.6)
Your  new NOTE  is without name and address.

"Is String Theory Justified?"
    The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the generation of a
"theory of everything". It is the goal to generate a single set of equations
which deals with all physical processes. Mathematical theoreticians have

<< Among the most interesting developments
presented to the  SAC was the geometrical approach to
the data analysis  developed by GP-B Chief Scientist,
Mac Keiser, in late  July and August. This approach

Using the results of Exercise the First and Exercise the Second,  come
up with a plausible explanation for  observed motions of long distance
voyagers.
Barry

====Ajay  Sharma responds to  Rambus2...@yahoo.com--------------
Disclose your name and address. Respect scientific talent of world.
Awaken your soul.
The most of people with whom you discuss know what you are doing.