| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| "The Right Angle Lever Paradox" | 31 Oct 2006 13:31 GMT | 2 |
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox" The "Right Angle Lever Paradox" is a classic construct which is taught in most courses in Special Relativity. As with all paradoxes, it reveals that and error has been made in our thinking. It may be interesting then to
|
| Noam Chomsky | 31 Oct 2006 11:17 GMT | 25 |
I found this quote by Noam Chomsky, that's quite thought provoking: ______________ If you go back to the Bible, there's a category of people who were called prophets, a translation of an obscure word, they were
|
| Relativity - Affine Geometry ? | 30 Oct 2006 23:54 GMT | 3 |
Relativity - Affine Geometry ? Abstract: Einstein addressed the twin paradox in special relativity in a relatively unknown, unusual and rarely cited paper written in 1918, in the form of a
|
| Objections to SR, specifically for <spamspamspam3> Ed Green's response. | 30 Oct 2006 22:58 GMT | 1 |
"Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@netzero.com> wrote in message news:1162146767.873648.38770@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
| Androcles wrote: |
| Apples | 30 Oct 2006 20:21 GMT | 9 |
Physics has a lot to say about why and how apples fall from trees. It's quite common to see apples drawn in physics texts - often on the cover. Much importance seems to be attached to them. But I haven't managed to find any physics texts that have much to say
|
| SR fundamental contradiction | 30 Oct 2006 15:50 GMT | 230 |
SR fundamental contradiction ------------------------------------------ Luttgens: Let x = ct.
|
| Hund's Law, Superconductivity and the Exclusion Principle | 30 Oct 2006 15:29 GMT | 3 |
This is a Hypergeometrical Universe take on those problems. Hund's law is presented in terms of minimizing four-dimensional volume during the trajectory of the Fat Electron. Superconductivity goes one step further and consider the subsequent
|
| yet another paradox (?) | 29 Oct 2006 13:00 GMT | 9 |
Please bear with me again. Consider a spaceship with two people at front and back ends. The person at the front resets his clock and sends a light signal to the person at the back, who resets his clock when he receives the signal. Then, they both move to the center of the ship to
|
| Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas? | 29 Oct 2006 12:12 GMT | 85 |
Inverse sound waves cancel each other out, so why can't there be a gravity equivalent? TrekJunky
|
| /\ The Quantum Pyramid /\ | 29 Oct 2006 03:31 GMT | 1 |
Quantum Pyramid The Quantum Pyramid is another powerful aspect of our philosophy. The understanding of the pyramid combined with our method of reproducing this effect has led us to the realization that we create our own
|
| Propeller is sharp and to the point | 28 Oct 2006 23:06 GMT | 1 |
He guards the gateway to the road to men's hearts. Once the tyrranosaur was alive and the tooth-set dead. Now the tables are turned. The teeth live the tyrant's remnants from past to future. As Propeller.
|
| Faster than Light? | 27 Oct 2006 20:48 GMT | 60 |
Faster than Light? The theory of relativity claims that the motion of physical objects cannot exceed a speed of 300,000km/sec. However, we know from experience (e.g. equatorial rocket launchings, multistage rocket
|
| Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | 27 Oct 2006 18:55 GMT | 15 |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION The link with detailed discussion (i) How and When E=mc2 was derived ? (ii) What are conditions of derivation ?
|
| Einstein's discoveries a priori synthetic? | 27 Oct 2006 18:12 GMT | 7 |
Have heard it asserted Einstein's discovery's of special and general relativity were made through purely rational means, ie mostly through his famous "thought" experiments and such. Am looking for a concise summary of how true such a viewpoint is,
|
| mass increase due to speed | 27 Oct 2006 17:34 GMT | 41 |
If you were in a spaceship with absolutely nothing in your visual range, and another identical spaceship moving in a straight line flew passed you, SR tells us that it would be impossible to know who's moving and who's stationary. But wouldn't measuring the mass of both ...
|