Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2006

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:b99ah.9812$6t.9788@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...

Does anyone know if it is possible to wirelessly transmit electricity from
one point to another like light or radio waves?  I know that you can
generate electricity from light, radio or sound waves, but is there a more
efficient way?  What research is being done in this field?

When can we use special relativity?
I'd like to have some comments on this.
But I think the simple answer is that we can use special relativity as
long as no force fields are involved.

"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_e> wrote in message news:...

"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
    The present philosophy in theoretical physics is to search for
mathematical relationships that predict experimental results that are then
used to verify the validity of the mathematics in defining our physical

Does it mean that a larger cock, with more mass will affect
timespace more than a tiny microcock?
Therefore, a man with a larger cock can satisfy his sex-partner
better, because the cock with more mass will affect timespace

This paper has proposed a theoretical idea to construct
nuclei by using  neutron and proton as well as the weak
force interaction among them; it has theoretically estimated
the radii of neutron and proton as well as the range and

anyone knows that relativity is not the right theory, therefore
time works against science, imagine a scientist comming
with the real theory 100 years from now, they will not belive
him because relativity has been undisputed 200 years etc

Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background
fractile 3D mesh of H filaments lit by hypernovae: Murray 2006.11.21
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/20
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/07/image/b/

time dilation, make it simple
askin tha twin acceleratin away about his time and watch,
he will say that there been no problems with his time, time
flew as usual

Dear Sirs
apparently the most fundamental in relativity is the wave,
particle and reference frame
can light be considered as a reference frame having

the law of entropy, which more basic then any relativity,
dictates that the amount of information will be less, ergo
we will know less
what about this paradox, we think that we will know more

is it true or is it possible that nature works by at least 3 time rates
1. a super fast atomic level time rate
2. an usual time rate we do newtonians
3. a relativistic time rate with time dilation and all that sh.t

It is my understanding that as the quarks in a baryon get pulled apart
in an accelerator collision, the potential energy from the color force
gets converted into a quark anti-quark pair, regenerating the original
baryon and producing a meson. It seems to me that the tidal forces

Dear Sirs
I have difficulties to see the empiricals in twin paradox, but
only can see subjective evaluations,
please show me the empiricals, not the arithmetics