Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / January 2007

einstein was right, quantum physics makes no sense,
it is only becaUSE wrong mathematics which is'not physics

Almost all of the predictions of special relativity are predictions of
the effects of changes in motion on the equations with which we model
physical phenomena. They fall into two classes:
(a) A change from one reference frame, A, to another, B, in motion

Albert Einstein made the thought experiment of travelling along with a
beam of light, at the Speed Of Light, holding a mirror outwards in
front of his face, to observe what happens to his reflection.
What would the consequences be if one replace's the mirror with that

The wikipedia article on the Einstein field equations makes the
statement that
  R_uv = (1/2)*R*g_uv
reduces to

That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
In case you think I was running away from your questions, I wasn't.

Whilst idly thumbing through the Usenet Physics FAQ (http://
www.weburbia1.demon.co.uk/physics (v. Nov2006) and the and Charter
(http://www.weburbia1.demon.co.uk/physics/Administrivia/Charters/
relativity.txt) I came up with the following paradox which is closely

Hi Tim et al, fascinating stuff.
65,000,000 years ago a T-Rex ate a Triciratops.
5,000,000 years ago Tim and my common grand
mom started walking upright.

See
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module4_time_dilation.htm
Click on Time dilation.
The animation shows Jasper's and Zoe's observation of a single light

It is shown http://vps137.narod.ru/articles5a.html that the MMX
as the key experiment in the affirmation of the theory
of relativity has not a suffecient sensibility to fix the velocity of
the

i dont knoe about photons, but phonons has no mass
can you weight a phonon? you cant, can you?
consequently, you can trap a photon becus is heavy matterial,
but you never can trap a phonon

I developed a fully geometrical representation of the Universe and am
now explaining the Hypergeometrical Standard Model.  The first
instalment is the Hyperon Family.
The site is http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com

if the smallest amont of energy postulated by planck is smaller
or even is continuum till infinitismal then quantum physics is
dead
it is dead, but relativity still alive and kicking

accortingg dimension  definition, time should be orthogonal
either on x-axe, y-axe or z-axa
what is time t orthogonal on?

most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
no idea what a tensor stands for
when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as

i new blatant error i discovered just i walked back to
my home from outside
in relativity al the tension elements at a particular tensor
then used in derivation, are considered acting simulaneus