Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / April 2007

Suppose I draw a diagram,
(M1) and (M2) are Massive objects, the "=="
is a supporting scafold, and EL1 and EL2 are
enclose ELevators, and all components are at

I am a stupid guy, who does not know the answer to this problem: A body
(observer) moves in a stationary frame with speed v<c. It sends a light
signal travelling with speed c+v (parallel with v). What will be the speed
of the signal after reflection on a stationary mirror (which ...

If we must obey Planck's constant "h" for ONE unit of light then it
seems obvious that Einstein's Photoelectric effect obeys Newtonian
Mechanics??
Einstein's two photoelectric effects are:

"The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
    A recent newspaper question and answer column raised an interesting
subject. The query noted that, for a science course at a local school, there
were two instructors. One of those instructors explained the concepts

Has an armature ever been tested in space ?

In another post I mentioned there are no unresolved foundational issues with
GR.  And to the best of my knowledge there isn't.  But an actual
knowledgeable poster thought I was joking.  Does anyone know what of any
actual unresolved issues?  No cranks please - although I doubt it ...

1. Not just warps spacetime but Mass may have created the last 2
dimensions.
2. And Mass is gradually slowing down the flow of time
****************************************************

how matter knows which action is least?
there must be an input with all possible actions, then
a routine at subatomic level doing a compare then
chose the most economical action for them, because

Quantum theorists often try to graft a dynamic proper time onto world-
lines. This local temporal evolution seems to ignore the, as far as I
know still viable, fact that the "arrow of time" has no physical
preference in physics. I am very uncomfortable imposing a local wave

Please visit
http://dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com/

=============
Max Planck
Nobel Lecture, June 2, 1920
"There is in particular one problem whose exhaustive

HOW CAN BE EXPLAINED THE TIDE
We know that the tide of the oceanic water appears as a result of the
moon gravitational attraction. This phenomenon can be fully explained
by the use of the Newton's law of the universal attraction:

Einstein's equivalence principle doesn't apply to light
Einstein showed with his thought experiment ("let us imagine
a spacious chest...", that a *constant* gravitational field
is equivalent to uniform acceleration.

On Metaphysics. (The Modern Definition)
* I rarely engage in spiritual conversation, but recently I have been
doing some research into the Law of Attraction philosophy. So in order
to come to terms with the 'LOA', I have had to think like a proponent

"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
    One of the basic beliefs of modern physics is that the velocity of
light is the same wherever and whenever it is measured. It is, in the
language of physics, invariant. To illustrate this understanding, let us