| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| first post in NG --blackbody question | 09 Apr 2007 13:29 GMT | 6 |
I understand why blackbody radiation is spread out due to the doppler shift of the atoms, but why do hot objects give off photons? And where do the photons come from? If they came from the dropping of electrons to lower energy states,
|
| Does light aberration occur all around the source? | 09 Apr 2007 10:03 GMT | 4 |
(Einstein's relativity, doppler effects and aberration of light) Say the aberration angle = phi When phi=0 (no aberration) the light is observed directly on one axis .... So say when phi = 80 degrees, does the light aberration occur
|
| transformation equations | 09 Apr 2007 06:27 GMT | 693 |
Since the Lorentz equations were applied to the problem presented to physicists by the Michelson-Morley experiment, mathematicians have universally agreed that they have proven mathematically that the only equations that could possibly exist as transformation equations that
|
| Velocity | 09 Apr 2007 01:21 GMT | 24 |
I saw this following explanation in a popular book on relativity. We have a space ship that expends enough energy to accelerate to 15 c. Next, we observe that ship and measure its velocity. Surprise, its velocity is below one c.
|
| relativity time kraft | 09 Apr 2007 00:44 GMT | 5 |
when a time kraft appears moving apparently with no inertia is becus not the flying obect is moving but becus we are moving with respecto to him becus with respect to himself he is traveleing at inifinte speed while
|
| The Voice of Religion. | 08 Apr 2007 19:08 GMT | 8 |
Since relativists preach their myth with religious verve, the 'Voice of Religion' message below is equally applicable to them. THE VOICE OF RELIGION. I bought a striking 500(?) year old painting of the Holy Family depicting
|
| speed of light inconsistency | 08 Apr 2007 17:01 GMT | 2 |
while tha speed of light is close to inifinity, for an information packet transported by light, take an event or an image for instance, it gets pretty confused when arrives at its destination receptacle surface
|
| opposite, complementary and the "not even wrong" ways of thinking | 07 Apr 2007 16:27 GMT | 2 |
The opposite and complementary ways of thinking and the "not even wrong" Amongst different ways of thinking we are entitle to choose and stick to a personal line of thought.
|
| SR clock sync problem | 07 Apr 2007 14:55 GMT | 13 |
In solutions to various problems (as in the twin's paradox) clocks appear to get reset when frames are changed. And the change in time is a function of the distance of events, although in any given reference frame distances between clocks have nothing to do with clock
|
| Einstein elevators thought experiment | 07 Apr 2007 14:48 GMT | 147 |
Excerpt from Strobel's Astronomy Notes. http://www.astronomynotes.com/relativity/s3.htm "Part of Einstein's genius was his ability to look at ordinary things from a whole new perspective and logically follow through on the
|
| Relativity - Apollo Moon Mission | 07 Apr 2007 05:53 GMT | 3 |
Criticality accident http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident It has also been proposed by some, that the blue flash is produced when beta radiation from the criticality
|
| My Absolute Reference Frame | 07 Apr 2007 01:55 GMT | 6 |
t'=t/gamma How do yo like that! dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science we always test the constancy of light as a truth.
|
| Draft on Set Theory and Development of Special Relativity | 06 Apr 2007 23:57 GMT | 7 |
It is clear now that Garciadiego’s book on the set-theoretica “paradoxes” (BERTRAND RUSSELL AND THE ORIGINS OF THE SET-THEORETI 'PARDOXES') is a dagger pointed straight at the heart of Gödel’ theorem. Above all, this devastating book demolishes not only Jule
|
| Modern-day religions! | 06 Apr 2007 13:58 GMT | 4 |
Modern-day religions! Religions are important! A man's religion is one of the most important ways we have to judge a person, because religion can be freely invented. It is
|
| length contraction difficulty | 06 Apr 2007 13:06 GMT | 34 |
I posted a simple example of moving a rod from one inertial frame into another which showed that length contraction of the rod cannot take place instantaneously. The consensus of reponses basically thought that the nucleus of each atom reached their proper length almost
|