Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Where is my error in the following physics behavior?24 May 2007 19:10 GMT11
#1. Wikipedia says that either:  two single high frequency photons or
two high temperature/intensity photon beams (therefore a mutlitude of
photons) can collide together and produce an electron/
positron......correct?
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"24 May 2007 15:28 GMT1
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our
Universe"
    The basic tenet of both Special and General Relativity is that the laws
and constants of the Science of Physics are the same within all velocity
O'Barr: How does SR compare with LET?24 May 2007 13:51 GMT11
How does SR compare with LET?
  There is no comparison at all!
SR tells us nothing but impossible things!
LET tells us things that makes perfect sense!
AN IMPORTANT QUANTUM PRINCIPAL23 May 2007 09:50 GMT6
I repeat since many object:
BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO GENERATE THE SAME MATTER(SAME PARTICLES:
1. FROM A HIGH FREQUENCY COLLISION (BETWEEN TWO PHOTONS)
2. OR FROM A HIGH INTENSITY COLLISION (BETWEEN MULTIPLE PHOTONS) ...AS
Heisenberg's Uncertainty23 May 2007 08:48 GMT6
There's two types of uncertainties, one is the capability to
"accurately" measure the other is an uncertainty pertaining to
probability of location, this latter is Heisenberg's Uncertainty: the
more you know the velocity the less you know the electron's position
black hole simulator for Schwarzschild and Gullstrand-Painleve coordinates23 May 2007 06:34 GMT3
I've completed a Java applet gravity simulator for Newton
and Schwarzschild black holes.  The simulator does multiple
particles simultaneously and works in both Schwarzschild
and Gullstrand-Painleve (river) coordinates:
the moon surface is soft21 May 2007 19:04 GMT23
according to relativity gringos put gringos on moon, but
where are the strongest evidences
evidence nr 1.
// insert your evidence here
The proof of mass vector.21 May 2007 02:58 GMT328
The proof of mass vector.
Ka-In Yen
yenkain@yahoo.com.tw
http://www.geocities.com/redlorikee
Time and distance21 May 2007 01:15 GMT11
Why can't people accept that time is really defining distance rather
than some invisible passage ? Seems easy to me.
-y
Doppler paradox.21 May 2007 00:21 GMT3
I have put this question to another group, and not yet received
convincing solutions, so would appreciate others' coments;
To spacecraft A and B are approaching each other relative velocity of
c / 2.
O'Barr: The facts of relativity.20 May 2007 21:09 GMT20
O'Barr: The facts of relativity.
  In the Special Theory of Relativity (SR), we use
inertial reference frames.  In the paradox of the
twins there are three reference frames, A, B and C,
100 years of inquisition in Physics is now over!20 May 2007 17:02 GMT2
Armenian Transformation Equations for Relativity
This article and upcoming other articles design to bring Aryan Renaissance in science. No matter how strong the inquisition is and how many armadas of Jesuits they have, they cannot stop the creative Aryan mind. Armenian Aryans need ...
THE GALILEIAN COORDINATE SYSTEM20 May 2007 06:20 GMT23
THE GALILEIAN COORDINATE SYSTEMS
Einstein to be somehow different with the Newton's definition of the
absolute coordinate system gave a new definition under the name
Galileian coordinate system. This definition is given in page 12 of
Some have said that all em waves are photons?20 May 2007 02:55 GMT1
If the above is true then since we can collide two photons togheter
then we can collide two radio em waves together???
Actually how come we can collide two photons together since I thought
all waves do not collide with each other but instead overlap each
Two photons can become one photon?20 May 2007 00:56 GMT3
Two photons collide and produce postiron and electron.
If the positron and electron collide they are annihilated and produce
a single photon (and not two)?
Therefore you started with two photons and end up with a single
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 April, 2007
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.