| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Where is my error in the following physics behavior? | 24 May 2007 19:10 GMT | 11 |
#1. Wikipedia says that either: two single high frequency photons or two high temperature/intensity photon beams (therefore a mutlitude of photons) can collide together and produce an electron/ positron......correct?
|
| "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe" | 24 May 2007 15:28 GMT | 1 |
"What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe" The basic tenet of both Special and General Relativity is that the laws and constants of the Science of Physics are the same within all velocity
|
| O'Barr: How does SR compare with LET? | 24 May 2007 13:51 GMT | 11 |
How does SR compare with LET? There is no comparison at all! SR tells us nothing but impossible things! LET tells us things that makes perfect sense!
|
| AN IMPORTANT QUANTUM PRINCIPAL | 23 May 2007 09:50 GMT | 6 |
I repeat since many object: BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO GENERATE THE SAME MATTER(SAME PARTICLES: 1. FROM A HIGH FREQUENCY COLLISION (BETWEEN TWO PHOTONS) 2. OR FROM A HIGH INTENSITY COLLISION (BETWEEN MULTIPLE PHOTONS) ...AS
|
| Heisenberg's Uncertainty | 23 May 2007 08:48 GMT | 6 |
There's two types of uncertainties, one is the capability to "accurately" measure the other is an uncertainty pertaining to probability of location, this latter is Heisenberg's Uncertainty: the more you know the velocity the less you know the electron's position
|
| black hole simulator for Schwarzschild and Gullstrand-Painleve coordinates | 23 May 2007 06:34 GMT | 3 |
I've completed a Java applet gravity simulator for Newton and Schwarzschild black holes. The simulator does multiple particles simultaneously and works in both Schwarzschild and Gullstrand-Painleve (river) coordinates:
|
| the moon surface is soft | 21 May 2007 19:04 GMT | 23 |
according to relativity gringos put gringos on moon, but where are the strongest evidences evidence nr 1. // insert your evidence here
|
| The proof of mass vector. | 21 May 2007 02:58 GMT | 328 |
The proof of mass vector. Ka-In Yen yenkain@yahoo.com.tw http://www.geocities.com/redlorikee
|
| Time and distance | 21 May 2007 01:15 GMT | 11 |
Why can't people accept that time is really defining distance rather than some invisible passage ? Seems easy to me. -y
|
| Doppler paradox. | 21 May 2007 00:21 GMT | 3 |
I have put this question to another group, and not yet received convincing solutions, so would appreciate others' coments; To spacecraft A and B are approaching each other relative velocity of c / 2.
|
| O'Barr: The facts of relativity. | 20 May 2007 21:09 GMT | 20 |
O'Barr: The facts of relativity. In the Special Theory of Relativity (SR), we use inertial reference frames. In the paradox of the twins there are three reference frames, A, B and C,
|
| 100 years of inquisition in Physics is now over! | 20 May 2007 17:02 GMT | 2 |
Armenian Transformation Equations for Relativity This article and upcoming other articles design to bring Aryan Renaissance in science. No matter how strong the inquisition is and how many armadas of Jesuits they have, they cannot stop the creative Aryan mind. Armenian Aryans need ...
|
| THE GALILEIAN COORDINATE SYSTEM | 20 May 2007 06:20 GMT | 23 |
THE GALILEIAN COORDINATE SYSTEMS Einstein to be somehow different with the Newton's definition of the absolute coordinate system gave a new definition under the name Galileian coordinate system. This definition is given in page 12 of
|
| Some have said that all em waves are photons? | 20 May 2007 02:55 GMT | 1 |
If the above is true then since we can collide two photons togheter then we can collide two radio em waves together??? Actually how come we can collide two photons together since I thought all waves do not collide with each other but instead overlap each
|
| Two photons can become one photon? | 20 May 2007 00:56 GMT | 3 |
Two photons collide and produce postiron and electron. If the positron and electron collide they are annihilated and produce a single photon (and not two)? Therefore you started with two photons and end up with a single
|