Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / June 2007

THE PYTHAGORAS THEOREM HAVING A COSMOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Reading about the cosmological significance of the Pythagoras theorem
about the relation between the legs of a right angle triangle:
a^2+b^2=c^2, I was really surprised that could written such a thing.

They say a change of direction causes the electron to perpendicularly
emit radiation but:
Feynman Diagram: Electron changes direction but does not emit a
photon?

1. I don't think so perhaps in an orbital where it increase frequency
or is is amplitude (since I beleieve I read that it affects it's
oscillation)?
2. But when an electron travels in empty space....it's velocity

Over a period of time, I have collected relevant data and fundae about
higher studies in mathematics and in mathematical sciences, pure and
applied mathematics, computational finance, modelling, statistics and
analytics and have put them up at a blog. You can check it out at:

how matter come into existence?
simply by motion, its coming direct from relaticity
if a mass particle runs at speed of light in vacuum then it absorbs
the entire universe

if relativity were wrong and aliens were here around in
their big ufos, then they would laugh their a.s out if
top sciencists in their big cars went along with tha wrong
relativity, they would say - you fools, but they say nothen

In my blog about the Hypergeometrical Universe, I posted a simple
solution to the supersolidity problem.  This problem arises from an
experiment which has been interpreted along the lines of superfluidity
of solid Helium-4 phases.

=========.
Once N. Bohr said, if a theory was right it had to be
" crazy " enough. " Oh! "- another physicists said,-
"No problem. We will try to create new "crazy" theories."

I made a mistake when I changed the co-ordinates from linear to exponential
to look inside a black hole. You see the scale is similar to the Kelvin
scale. By using a linear scale we can see 0 but it cannot be reached. We
should really be using a log scale so 0 is - infinity so ...

The real paradoxes in SR.
  SR is itself a paradox.  In fact, SR is full of
paradoxes.  These are real paradoxes, not just
imagined paradoxes.

I have tried to develop a hypothesis. It sounds really wierd but i
want you to tell me if it could be even 0.05% right
Suppose the speed of light can increase beyond its known value.
Suppose that In the higher dimensions it can .. Then as the speed of

how long it takes for an electric field E to drop
from 100V to 5V (fall time, tf)
how long it takes for tha same field to drop
from 100V to 0V

top sciencists in big cars dictates that simultaneous does
not may exists in our universe we inhabit
but really, this is foken arrogant statement to spew out, becus
humans (carbon based compound matter) are totally insignificant

On occasion, Reginald Cahill has presented a simplified re-analysis of
Michelson-Morley experiments that omits the Fresnel drag effect.
Eg See:
Re-Analysis of Michelson-Morley Experiments

I've decided my brain needs more of a workout than it's been getting
in the last few years, and having had an interest in black holes I
thought they sound like more than enough of a challenge! I apologise
if this is not the appropriate group - it seemed more logical to place