| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Time can be described without duration and succession | 30 Sep 2007 23:48 GMT | 40 |
The last stronghold of the realist is time. Surely, no-one can deny succession, duration, before and after? These are things in themselves, despite our cognitions- they exist in spite of us. Yet time is easier to dispose of than space:
|
| they want me to accept his tensors | 30 Sep 2007 22:09 GMT | 1 |
how they want me to accept his tensors, while eintein dident knew his tesors watsoever why not him first getting himself an education learning about tensors, differential geometry,
|
| "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website" | 30 Sep 2007 16:09 GMT | 1 |
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website" The Einsteinhoax Website was setup to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether
|
| Yang-Mills version of General Relativity's renormalizable substratum | 30 Sep 2007 02:45 GMT | 1 |
The key equation is Rovelli's (2.89) for only the torsion-free curvature-only spin connection in terms of the tetrads. It has quadratic and a quartic parts. The quartic part can be put into the the desired form but the quadratic part cannot. Also both parts depend on gradients
|
| IaSNe (revised) | 29 Sep 2007 23:25 GMT | 8 |
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING Ia SUPERNOVAE by Dwain W. Higginbotham When a IaSne explodes in a non red shifted environment it reaches maximum brightness in 21 days. This is called the rise time of the light curve. When a IaSne occurs in a red shifted galaxy you can tell
|
| the brain of einstein | 29 Sep 2007 19:38 GMT | 3 |
they took out tha brain of einstein from his skull and preserve it in a liquid of some sort this is unpleasing for him, so if you publish to many right papers, they do it with your brain too
|
| can universe make sense? | 29 Sep 2007 09:09 GMT | 4 |
why at small scale tha rules imposed by universe apparently makes sense, while at large scales and nanosmall scales tha same universe impose rules that
|
| Black holes and relativity | 29 Sep 2007 03:32 GMT | 1 |
I was trying to imagine what would happen to a particle moving at relativistic velocities as it approached a black hole from a great distance. Obviously, it can't accelerate at the rate Newtonian physics predicts, because it would exceed the speed of light well before it
|
| USM | 28 Sep 2007 11:10 GMT | 1 |
|
| johnreed-Math and Universe, Part 5, September 27, 2007 | 28 Sep 2007 02:43 GMT | 2 |
The Universe and the Mathematics: Why They Are So Well Matched Take 1A - Modified September 27, 2007 John Lawrence Reed, Jr.
|
| Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2 | 28 Sep 2007 00:22 GMT | 2 |
Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Are We Emergent in an Electro Magnetic Universe? Part 2, September 21, 2007 John Lawrence Reed, Jr.
|
| "A Basic Look at the Aether" | 27 Sep 2007 20:04 GMT | 1 |
"A Basic Look at the Aether" Until the start of the 20th century, the fundamental structure of the Universe was considered to be based upon the claasical Aether. This viewpoint ran into trouble when the Michealson-Morley Experiment failed to
|
| even droplets says relativity is wrong | 27 Sep 2007 19:27 GMT | 4 |
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070924143342.htm hahahaha
|
| Please fill me in on shuba | 27 Sep 2007 17:09 GMT | 10 |
Since I tend to block posters at the first sign of trouble I miss out on the lies and defamation of character that they post when the find the opportunity. shuba was one such person. I recall himn insulting me so I did a block sender on him.
|
| Other kook newsgroups? | 27 Sep 2007 15:50 GMT | 16 |
Other than the obvious *.kook. usenet groups, are there other groups that masquerade as legitimate forums that are populated almost entirely by nutcases? Most groups have one or two resident kooks who promote their nonsensical
|