Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / September 2007

Seems to me that several people here confuse insults with what was meant as
criticism.
Hanson - I believe that you incorrectly took my comments in another thread
as insults when they were merely posted with the intent of criticism.

If the universe is spiralling ***slightly*** and uniformly then the
spiral would go unoticed.
Same as standing on a carrousel, all objects remain fixed on the
carrousel.

I'm still trying to get my head around mathematics, and have a
question regarding the paths in the Schwarzschild solution.
I am calculating the gravitational time dilation around the
gravitating body by using this equation:

Don't know If the Universe is a perfect linear expansion in all
direction or if the Universe is also slightly spiralling.
But if it is slightly spiralling then an observed expansion for
"large" distances is "perhaps" FALSE due to the ********CORIOLIS

An "object" in orbit DOES NOT accelerate in the true meaning of the
word for it's speed remains constant and it's kinetic energy is Not
Depleted.
The only time the object LOSES energy is when it shrinks the radius of

my intuition says that while moon landing was real,
relativity was faked easily at that time, becus there
was not many people involved, and they wanted to
promote in example

Androcles has presented a discussion of the MMX at:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mmx4dummies.htm
He says:
"To the "stationary" observer on the left the yellow path of the "tip

my intuition says that when they discovered that
special relativity was completely wrong, and was
not related to nature or reality in any way, they
decided to call it "special", in stead of taking back

Imbeciles can't comprehend the meaning of Normal Force.
If you tilt the ground the car is resting on, the Force is no longer
Normal and the car loses Kinetic or Potential Energy.
LIKEWISE for SYNCHROTRON RADIATION, the magnetic force is not like the

if tha universe is expanding accelerating, and
according to relativity, he is expanding in himself,
then there is no expandation anywhere, or expanding
has another meaning not related to volume, end of story

tha main reason for relaticity is not becus
she is easy but becus she is hard

if you split a laser then let a beam pass
thro a semitransparent 10m chamber felt with
stuff and bulshit, but not changing the origianal
color,

understand this for me gentlemen
if light from A to B goes in 1 second, aCcording ta relativity
a grain of metal would do tha job in only ½ of second, and
even less

Those that said radiation loss occurs due to orbit acceleration are
stupid.
Planet's do the SAME their kinetic energy remains constant, no energy
loss (only when their radial distance to the sun shrinks).

Is Mass an Emergent Quantity in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
Are We Emergent in an Electro Magnetic Universe?
Part 1, September 2, 2007
John Lawrence Reed, Jr.