Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2007

Has anyone ever delved into the metaphysical when studying relativity?
Could relativity have a duality with the observer?  We all know of
course that
sometimes observing something changes the observed.  So could thoughts

My replies to messages in the five other threads can be found in this one
thread. I will not use the others in future.
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

while only matter tells space-time how to curve,
why are they fooling us in movie documentaries,
by saying that they can curve space without the
required matter, in order for them to travel faster

seems ta me that tha seldestablished relativists
have big mouth about mathematics to physics
relation,
but when they are asked about a specific situation,

while you can do tensors by hand, partial differential
equations are 1000x more difficult to handle than tensors
therefore you need a computer in order to see what happens
how could einstein be sure on his paper when he dident had

how can they, tha reviewers, accept einsteins papers
to publication, when none of them checked relativity
modeled sciencific numerically, with error calculation
and suc?

hahaha
a sciencist not saying "einstein" in his papers is not a sciencists
http://www.physorg.com/news115400732.html
"Researchers examine Einstein's theories on the universe

Kepler proposed the relationship between a planets orbital period with
its distance from the Sun -
But it is absolutely certain and exact that the ratio which exists
between the periodic times of any two planets is precisely the ratio

Is the so called FlyBY anomaly originated by the LASOF ellipsoid?
As is stated before, the ellipsoidal shaped LASOF  (local A-
symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) frame seems to influence the
lightspeed around the earth in a complex way.

"How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
    The previous posting showed ("A Basic Look at the Aether") that the
classical Aether must exist because it endowed the volume of supposedly
"empty" space with observable properties. If space were not filled with

i am almost sure that einstein dindent gave any explanation
to tha so many infinities popping out every places in relativity
if i take a look in his code i am sure that he also divided by
zero without knowing it

according to relativity we dont have space and time anymore
we dont have space becus it becomes compressed at high
speeds, and at c space  disappear completely
we neither have time becus a c time for us stops flowing

my intuition tells me that relativity simply to dont adds up
what science and real truth are thay hiding from
us becus thay dont think we can handle tha real truth?
and where ta find more information about all this?

A challenge to SR experts
A rocket has an initial velocity v0.
What would be its velocity v1 after a trip of
1 ly, during which it is subject to a constant

I was wondering, if gravity curves space, then why does it matter how
fast you move through this space?
If it's only curved, the speed at which something moves through it
shouldn't make a difference on it's angle should it? If it would,