| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| SR & irreversible processes | 31 Dec 2007 15:09 GMT | 6 |
Some physics processes are not simply undone by reversing the steps. For example, a steel rod can be stretched beyond its elastic limit, and will not return to its original shape by simply reversing the stretching steps. Or a piece of clay may be malleable until it is
|
| SR & perpendicular motion | 31 Dec 2007 15:06 GMT | 7 |
Consider a rest frame that has 3 lasers at rest on the x-axis at x=-L, x=0, and x=L. Let these lasers point in the y direction of this rest frame. Let there be a planar surface just below each laser that is moving in the y direction, perpendicular to the x-axis, at some speed.
|
| M'I-5 P ersecution Harassm ent th rough the Rad io | 31 Dec 2007 10:26 GMT | 1 |
MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 9 July, 1999 Harassment in. Poland, July 1999 And still it continues.... in. my last fax I said that provided MI5 made no attempts at harassment. during my two-week holiday this summer, or after I
|
| EVOLUTION NOW A FOUR-LETTER WORD | 31 Dec 2007 05:34 GMT | 1 |
< http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fart < http://www.edconrad.com
|
| Flat => Curved Spacetime | 31 Dec 2007 05:07 GMT | 1 |
Hi all... The Riemann Christoffel tensor (R^a_bcd) is zero when the metric tensors may be transformed to constants, globally.
|
| "Retic Postings and SPAM" | 31 Dec 2007 01:50 GMT | 2 |
"Retic Postings and SPAM" There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
|
| "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?" | 29 Dec 2007 16:38 GMT | 2 |
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?" When a bullet is fired, an explosive charge imparts kinetic energy to the bullet. That kinetic energy travels with the bullet and is transferred to the target when the bullet strikes. The question to be answered is where
|
| Animation illustrating time dilation in satellites | 29 Dec 2007 16:37 GMT | 14 |
This is an applet illustrating time dilation in bodies moving in the vicinity of the Earth. http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/Satellites.html Good ol' Newton is used to determine the motion of the bodies,
|
| A multi-stage rocket and relativity | 29 Dec 2007 14:53 GMT | 27 |
A rocket ship leaves earth and accelerates to 99% the speed of light. It then stops accelerating and launches another rocket that accelerates to 99% the speed of light relative to the first rocket.
|
| a few questions about SR and its adherents | 29 Dec 2007 14:50 GMT | 24 |
Not being a physicist, but having a srong interest in traditional logic, I have several questions about Einstein's theory of special relativity (henceforth "SR") which perhaps some subcriber might be willing and able to answer. Here they are:
|
| after the logical refutation: what next? | 28 Dec 2007 23:37 GMT | 23 |
It appears that there will be no valid rebuttal of the logical refutation that I offered a few days ago. So far as I can tell, every response to what I called "the logical refutation" of SR on the thread of that title committed the same
|
| I am confused by relativity | 28 Dec 2007 21:40 GMT | 32 |
Relativity Geometry Relativity - Affine Geometry ? Einstein's special theory of relativity is about measurements between frames of reference in a state of non acceleration. It is an observation that the
|
| the logical refutation | 27 Dec 2007 22:21 GMT | 31 |
I invite a rebuttal of the following refutation of the special theory of relativity from its claims about time. I begin with the following account of the theory extracted from Wikipedia: "The relativity of simultaneity is the concept that simultaneity is
|
| Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page | 27 Dec 2007 17:01 GMT | 21 |
There is now an update the the FAQ page "What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?". There has been a renaissance in tests of Special Relativity (SR), in part because considerations of quantum gravity imply that SR may well be
|
| 5 reasons why Godels incompleteness theorem invalid | 27 Dec 2007 01:58 GMT | 4 |
The Autralian philosopher Colin Leslie Dean points out Godels theorems are invalid for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom ofreducibility- which is invalid, he uses the axiom of choice, he constructs impredicative statements -which
|