| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| if gravity is not a force, why they want to unite gravity with EM and other forces? | 29 Feb 2008 19:05 GMT | 4 |
amazin, adolf einstine gets a nobel proving gravity is not a force by geometry, then tha rest of his life, they say, he struggled to unite gravity with EM and weak and strong forces
|
| Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0 | 29 Feb 2008 15:01 GMT | 1 |
I have a question: Consider the path integral: Z = DA exp[-iS(A)] = C exp [iW(J)] where S(A) = $d^4x L. Above, the field variable is A, the source of the field is J, the
|
| The Concept 'Now' and Hyperbolic Spacetime | 29 Feb 2008 14:00 GMT | 38 |
There are a variety of ways in which we refer to the present time. We refer to the present year, the present month, week, day, hour, minute, and could refer even to the present microsecond, although it would take
|
| Is the extrinsic curvature of a curve related to its 4-acceleration? | 29 Feb 2008 09:27 GMT | 1 |
Say we have a curve embedded in a 2-D manifold. I actually have two notions of curvature for this curve (not counting intrinsic since it's zero). One is its extrinsic curvature and the other its 4- acceleration. It seems to me they must be somehow related but I have
|
| what is the speed of gravity geometry? | 29 Feb 2008 02:56 GMT | 1 |
if gravity is not a force but geometry, how can this geometry have a speed?
|
| Astronomers discover largest-ever dark matter structures spanning 270M light-years | 29 Feb 2008 01:27 GMT | 1 |
A University of British Columbia astronomer with an international team has discovered the largest structures of dark matter ever seen. http://mozhi.org/mozhi%20news/ns406.htm Measuring 270 million light-years across, these dark matter structures
|
| Henri: Proof that the emission theory is inconsistent | 28 Feb 2008 19:12 GMT | 138 |
Henri, this one is for you. Given: The emission theory states that the speed of light is constant c relative to the source, and Galilean relativity applies.
|
| How are photons mirrored? | 28 Feb 2008 13:12 GMT | 13 |
What happens at the surface of the mirror? I will explain after I know how it works, for what purpose I asked this.
|
| The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity | 28 Feb 2008 12:34 GMT | 13 |
It was inevitable that if there were found to be serious flaws in our physics and in our understanding of gravity or such things as 'momentum' these would be quickly revealed beginning in the early 1970s, when human beings first began to explore space.
|
| Multi Level Marketing - Mutual Pension Plan - Teambuilding and Internet Marketing | 28 Feb 2008 11:20 GMT | 1 |
Mutual Assets - Washington, Brussels, Tokyo and London constructive center Global Institutional Fund Analytics - Pension Assets Prognostic (MLM). CWM WORLDWIDE - Principal Assets Prognostication Ascribe. A
|
| Contrasting Pair: Matter and Nothingness | 28 Feb 2008 05:48 GMT | 92 |
"Matter exists on the motion created by Nothingness drawing Matter back into the Nothingness from whence it came." Constructive comments in simple terms, pro and con will be appreciated.
|
| Worldwide Home Workers Needed. | 27 Feb 2008 23:12 GMT | 1 |
Worldwide Home Workers Needed. Earn by doing simple Computer Jobs. No Selling Required. No Going out of Home. No Office. No Boss. Not a 9 to 5 job. No experience required. Simple Jobs. Basic knowledge of
|
| Discarding Relativity: the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat | 27 Feb 2008 22:22 GMT | 22 |
I'm going to prove that when the travelling twin B returns close to twin A at rest, he is younger than A, and A is younger than B, too. It is saying the twin paradox and Schrodinger's cat are actually the same phenomenon!.
|
| the theory of close loop wormholed universe | 27 Feb 2008 19:52 GMT | 4 |
my intuition force me to explain how tha whole thing with universe sticks together there are nno any big bangs, neither small, and you always are in tha middle of univerese
|
| Kepler's Third Law | 27 Feb 2008 00:40 GMT | 19 |
On Feb 23, 7:17 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's a metric signature, Ken? > Now you have to explain why the masses of the planets as determined > through Kepler's 3rd law is wrong,... |