| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| A bit on NonSymmetrical Metrics. | 31 Mar 2008 23:24 GMT | 12 |
(Ken posted this to SPF). Hi Dr. Francis. I was confused, perhaps still am. My OP on NonSymmetric Christoffel's presumed that
|
| Re: Darfour or whatever, we need more than gathering at the Cenotaph | 31 Mar 2008 22:41 GMT | 1 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-xQoNDFwlE&feature=related That's it! -- 'foolsrushin.'
|
| momentum | 31 Mar 2008 19:19 GMT | 109 |
If there are two frames of reference, S and S', with S' moving with a velocity of v relative to S, we can showthis by the Galilean transformation equations. x'=x-vt
|
| dark energy and Casimir force | 31 Mar 2008 11:55 GMT | 2 |
one more strange idea: if there is dark energy, than its mainly dark. This means, the radiation term is cancelling out. This is expected in my model, because uniform propagation would cause even ratiation terms but of opposite sign.
|
| Revised Paper on Kaluza-Klein and Intrinsic Spin, Based on Spatial Isotropy | 30 Mar 2008 22:38 GMT | 1 |
Dear Friends: I have now prepared an updated revision of a paper demonstrating how the compact fifth dimension of Kaluza-Klein is responsible for the observed intrinsic spin of the charged leptons and their antiparticles. The more
|
| Lambda | 30 Mar 2008 20:22 GMT | 8 |
Hi Ng when I tried to answer a question about the starting condition of my quaternion model, I found, that it has to be random at the binning. In fact there was a very big discrepance between how the model behaved and something
|
| why relativity baboon PD use that unpleasant language when defeated? | 30 Mar 2008 18:40 GMT | 4 |
i dont understand why this selfestablished baboon in this post here http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/6ff73fae2cdfc18c use that unpleasant language when feels defeated
|
| Non-Symmetric Energy Tensors and Kaluza Klein Experiment | 30 Mar 2008 18:20 GMT | 21 |
After reviewing some very helpful discussion in prior threads regarding non-symmetric energy tensors and a Kaluza-Klein experiment, and am starting to shift my viewpoint to be in opposition to the idea of using a non-symmetric (Cartan / Tortion) energy tensor because of the adverse
|
| rotation and lightspeed | 30 Mar 2008 16:19 GMT | 4 |
Hi Ng in my model of spinning quaternions I get a problem: there is no notation for time. I have no way to define how fast an object is spinning. This rotation is assigned to an element of spacetime and I want to devide it into
|
| Shapiro delay deduced from newtonian gravity? | 30 Mar 2008 14:17 GMT | 33 |
It is often claimed that newtonian gravity can predict only half the correct deflection angle for light, and General Relativity can predict the whole correct one. I wonder, what about a shapiro delay under newtonian
|
| why baboon PD insists he is that stupid? | 30 Mar 2008 12:34 GMT | 4 |
this baboon is unbulivable stoopid, he insist shamelessly he is so foken stoopid, as for instance in this thread here, where he insists a magnetic needle heads toward north pole
|
| Question about interaction between two photons | 30 Mar 2008 03:16 GMT | 12 |
I wonder about how large acceleration would be between two photons in situation like this. Two photons move into the same direction on parallel trajectories in zero gravity field. A line perpedicular to theirs trajectories would
|
| "Is String Theory Justified?" | 30 Mar 2008 02:56 GMT | 1 |
"Is String Theory Justified?" The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the generation of a "theory of everything". It is the goal to generate a single set of equations which deals with all physical processes. Mathematical theoreticians have
|
| why a force is not a real force but gravity condensed? | 30 Mar 2008 00:08 GMT | 3 |
i think i just discovered that a force is not a force a bit spooky, but newton force is ill posed, becus what is a force?
|
| they are forcing me to understand relativity by not understanding | 29 Mar 2008 13:32 GMT | 5 |
incredible these high ranked are forcing me to understand relaticity by not understanding as for instance in this thread here http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/823776666cf168c7
|