Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / April 2008

Dear Newsgroup:
I have received an email by someone who is a professor at a well-known
university, I cannot reveal his name.
This is his letter.

This is the correct Doppler formula for all moving
bodies,
       f' = Exp(-v/c) f
       where,

Had a look at this and saw that the velocity curve of Algol will tell
whether we get the speed of light being constant or depends on the speed
of the emitting star.
It seems surprising that nobody's measured a velocity curve for Algol

It is well known that a Gaussian wavefunction, such as:
psi (x) = exp [Ax^2 + Bx}   (1)
has an uncertainty that satisfies the equality, not the inequality, in
the Heisenberg relationship, that is:

Dear Friends:
I am attempting to calculate the variance of a non-Gaussian
wavefunction:
psi(x) = exp [-(1/2)Ax^2-Bx]

Dear Newsgroup:
When I started search for my life time research topic, I wanted to
engage in such a research to be able to bring a formula within the
universe as simple and beautiful one like E = m c^2.

The basic problem with current interpretation of relativity can be
seen from considering two frames of reference S and S' and how they
relate to the principle of equivalence.
  S is a set of coordinates at rest and S' is a set of coordinates in

Let's say there a moving system consisting of X-Ray photon source and
detector. The source is bellow the detector. The source releases high
energy xray photons vertically up.
----------

On Apr 25, 1:56 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote:

...

Under SR assumptions, the plane of simultaneity of an observer
moving towards you slopes upward relative to your plane of
simultaneity. This gives rise to the Andromeda paradox, pointed
out by Roger Penrose:

In Einstein's famous train and lightning problem, he comes to the
wrong conclusion because he did not fully apply the results of the
Michelson-Morley experiment as scientists have interpreted them, that
light travels with a velocity of c=186,000 miles per second in two

Chat with other members while you watch them, they watch you, or
both�don't be shy!
http://h1.ripway.com/NYforum/videocam.htm

Hello to all:
I'd like to get some advice on a problem I am presently considering.
Let's consider a Dirac spinor u(p), and for a concrete example, let's
take the u^(1) for an spin up electron, where N is the usual

MAGNETIC MONOPOLE RADIATION is the origin of the Aharonov Bohm effect.
Magnetic monopole photon trajectories around solenoids can also
explain the so called “Aharonov Bohm effect”.
Magnetic field-lines seem to be the result of the combined influence

According to my science, which I respect, the typical
place in universe is void without any matter, i mean
no stuff whatsoever
But this is not the entire story, because there is infinitely more