Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / June 2008

Here is something I heard at one time and was wondering if it has any
validity or if the supposition has been named.  It goes:  one could
have an emitting atom and a receiving atom of a photon and there not
be any actual physical photon that traveled the distance.  It's not

S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>light
Given a steady-velocity light source S which is
constantly emitting light of a given color, let
an inertial observer O move relative to S as shown:

Dear Friends
---
As you will soon see, I'm not a native speaking English.
I apologize for my poor language and I hope I'm going

"The world's first moving building, a 80-storey tower with revolving
floors giving an shifting shape, will be built in Dubai, its architect
says.
"The Dynamic Tower design is made up of 80 pre-fabricated apartments

It looks like relativity makes no any sense this year, much more
than it made no any sense in previous years.
And black holes, which evaporate !!? Which means that we are safe
against hadrons.

"The Source of Gravitational Energy"
    When one applies the correct relativistic transformations to
the gravitational field, the source of gravitational energy becomes
apparent. Unfortunately, due to a sophomoric error in the derivation of

Relativists still, as we speak, refuse to answer my questions
regarding
Quantum Electro Dynamics (QED), which I would like to not understand
as soon as possible.

A lot of relativity users just pop in here and pretend
they dont understand relativity.
But it takes much more than that
Because in order to really not understand relatibity you

Ok, I had a look at your solution : http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/cyclotron.htm
No wonder you were so cagey in sharing it, there are quite a few
glaring
mistakes. I hope that you will take the following as constructive

In my other post, “Elegant Proof of Einstein’s Error”, I have prove
logically that Special Relativity is erroneous.  Now I will show tha
not only is it erroneous, it is stupid.  I’ll start with a shor
story…

Absolute motion of an unstable particle through aether
produces dilation of its mean lifetime,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Zeno_effect
From this premise, it can be postulated that aether

The observation of the precession of the equinoxes is
a main point here. It is known that precession is about
5025 arcseconds per century. So, that means that if an
orbit of a body in solar system is seen preceding by

Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a  TOE.
Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,

who has been rateling my coffin and choped my left arm and leg off
sh.t and bolloks and I am now 25% brain dead so you should be able to
bet me in any debates by a mile, you wish, drop dead like I have just
done I still think that force is modification of time/space although

Dear Newsgroup:
Anyone is welcome to Basti newsgroups.
So, nothing personal (he/she wrote even in bad/good languages, against
me or not).