Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2008

RELATIVISTIC TIME DILATION AS A FUNCTION OF RELATIVE VELOCITY OF MOTIO
TO VELOCITY OF INFORMATION TRANSFE
In 1905 Albert Einstein published a landmark paper on Specia
Relativity.  It postulated that the speed of light is constant in

e have a lot of solutions manual about 700 solutions manual
to get solution manual you want please send message to
getsolution1@yahoo.com ,  getsolution1(at)yahoo.com
or getsolution1@hotmail.com , getsolution1{AT}hotmail.com

There is another thread in sci.physics.relativity entitled "Are
'observed' SR effects real?"  I have trouble following the discussion,
as maybe you do too.  I prefer to phrase the question in a way that to
me is much clearer.

Relativity Timelines
1638: Descartes (1596-1650) publishes the 'Dioptrics'. He presented an
idea of the ether as the carrier of light.
1678: Huygens (1629-1695) explains reflection, refraction and double

Sinnce m_0 *d^2x/dt^2=k (constant)  is Galilei invariant but not
Lorentz invariant, we have to redefine the impulse in SR as p=
\gamma(v)*m_0*v
We can prove that in the proper frame of the object F :

Photon or Wave Transmission of Light?
Photons are discrete energy points on electromagnetic waves that are
carried through and by a medium that permeates space and gaseous,
liquid and solid matter. The medium is the ether, an elastic solid.

http://www3.telus.net/foamyether
I find this very attractive, because ether is needed, which was
eliminated by Einsteins findings.
But he never said that there is no ether.

You see, the basic atomic clock actually has to use gravity
to get it's most accurate reading.
They actually have a "fountain" almost like a water fountain
only it is forcing a very tiny ball or atoms upward and it has to use

Dono challenged me to be more mathematical in my proof that the string
breaks in Bell's Spaceship Paradox (given in sci.physics.relativity at
July 15, 10:10 am)..  I maintained that my proof was sufficient.
For various reasons, I changed my mind.  A more mathematical proof (or

Why is SR still controversial?
Elements of reflexion can be found in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
A related question is

It was the evolving understanding of electromagnetism in the 19th
century that led to the theory of special relativity.
As we learn in Physics 1  (or maybe 2),  A magnetic field is produced
by a moving electric charge and acts on a moving charge.

Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
                                                           any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,

Hi Peter and all.
On Jul 14, 2:43 pm, Peter <end...@dekasges.de> wrote:

...

On Jul 13, 1:58 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On Jul 15, 10:51 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: