Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2008

An additional thought, Relativity is sound, but the fact that it is a
bookkeeping means to account for the effects produced by the changes in the
units of measurement between refernce frames differing in velocity and.or
elevation.

Who is laughing harder?
God, after inventing a way to make the survival of
our species contingent on a silly thing called sex.
  or

"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
    Many postings to Newsgroups are from posters who have difficulty with
the assertions of relativists that when tow velocities are added the
resultant velocity is not the algebraic sum oof the two velocities. The

We know that the very successful GPS (Global Positioning System) use a
unique inertial system denoted by ECI, where the Earth’s centre of
mass is at rest.  Since 1905 Relativity we also know that all inertial
systems are equivalent, not existing a privileged one. I am now

Let a source emit a photon toward an observer moving at speed
v wrt that source, such that this observer measures a wavelength
lambda for that emitted photon. Then, any increment/decrement dv
of the relative speed v will produce an increment/decrement df of

Once again, I will prove QED makes an inaccurate prediction of the ground
state binding (ionization) energy of hydrogen, in units of m^-1. I have
extracted the relevant observed value, in m^-1, from the text book "Quantum
Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles" ...

This is not a joke
They are damn serious in this thread here
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/61406
8d91eea325f/15c57c6d17e9a2db?hl=en#15c57c6d17e9a2db
They can hear invisible colored light and radio waves in AM

Let a source emit a photon toward an observer, where V is
the gravitational potential difference between them,
such that this observer measures a wavelength lambda for
that emitted photon. Then, any increment/decrement dV of

Could a charged (for the e-m interaction) particle  be massless?

In any other theory when you destroy time and space you violate 2nd
thermo and other things
But not in relativity
The high priests of church of relativity preach us that this is good

Einsteinhoax wrote,
 "If the Principle of Relativity is applicable then the length of our
yardsticks and the speed of our clocks must change as a result of the
postulated change in the free space velocity of light. Moreover, that

"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
    When a bullet is fired, an explosive charge imparts kinetic energy to
the bullet. That kinetic energy travels with the bullet and is transferred
to the target when the bullet strikes. The question to be answered is where

Juan R. González-Álvarez keeps touting this paper as "proof" that there
are "instantaneous interactions" in classical electrodynamics:
    Chubykalo and Vlaev, "Necessity of Simultaneous Co-existence of
    Instantaneous and Retarded Interactions in Classical

My friend, who has no training beyond high school physics, told me
that he heard that heading out from the Earth for one hour and then
back at light speed would mean that fourteen years would pass on
earth.

"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
    The idea that the velocity of light is the same no matter in what
reference frame it is measured is fundamental to the modern sceince of
physics. The premise started with the confusion resulting from failure of