Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
a black hole13 Jul 2008 03:44 GMT19
Hi all, another question....
The extension of the BH's horizon, if measured from external side....
has a measure different from zero and finite.... isn't it?
But what result could present a measure made from the "inside" (the
Time dilatation, but no relativity of simultaneity or length     contraction12 Jul 2008 20:51 GMT9
For those interested, there's an interesting paper by JH Field :-
Spatially-separated synchronised clocks in the same inertial frame:
Time dilatation, but no relativity of simultaneity or length
contraction
Relativists rejects the trivial solutions !!! Forcing me to learn and     not understand relativity in this vacation !!!12 Jul 2008 20:32 GMT2
Keep in mind too, that what they paid for, it gets
If you were paid,to do something for church of relativity, they will
extract from you exactly what they were paid for
When we understand that, then we'll look at universities, schools,
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers"11 Jul 2008 15:30 GMT1
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
    A recent newspaper question and answer column raised an interesting
subject. The query noted that, for a science course at a local school, there
were two instructors. One of those instructors explained the concepts
The Twin Fallacy and Schrodinger Kat10 Jul 2008 13:32 GMT129
Kat, who has been diagnosed with cancer, has 4 years to live. Sh
volunteers on a space mission to Alpha Centauri (4.37 lightyears away)
travels at 0.866c, and arrives there ~5.0 years later. According t
classical SR, Kat's time slows to a half and ages only ~2.5 years
Diagonalization in  Minkowski space10 Jul 2008 11:37 GMT17
Dear Friends
---
As you will soon see, I'm not a native speaking English.
I apologize for my poor language and I hope I'm going
They force me to watch the sky and see UFO !!!10 Jul 2008 01:27 GMT4
According to high level relativity, relativity predict bended space.
wormholes, black holes, time travel, parallel universe, entangled
matter and many other nice things
If all that were true, then there should be UFO from other planets
The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?09 Jul 2008 23:20 GMT3
There has been a fair amount of discussion on sci.physics.foundations in
the thread "Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden
Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?" regarding the fact that the velocity
operator "alpha" of the Dirac Hamiltonian appears to suggest that a
Androcles' Obsession and Attraction to Obscure Reasoning09 Jul 2008 22:49 GMT21
It seems that the only thing Androcles wants to know is
"Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
Is principle of constancy of light velovity necessary?09 Jul 2008 07:59 GMT27
It seems to me that principle of constancy of light velovity should be
integrated to principle of relativity in special theory of relativity.
There is my proof.
To be simple, thinking two inertial coordinate frames S1(x1,t1) and
Big Picture of GR09 Jul 2008 01:41 GMT23
Over the years I've picked up enough math/stats to understand the
pieces of general relativity and thus the explanation behind the
various paradoxes (twins, car/barn, etc.) However, on the Myers-Briggs
I happen to be an intuitive and can learn best when looking at things
PhD diplomas in relativity are to be called back !!!07 Jul 2008 23:18 GMT2
New rules
High ranked relativists, owning big cars, are forced to go into
laboratory
and touch measurement instruments, at least twice a year.
GR and Magnetostatics?07 Jul 2008 19:40 GMT4
**GR and Magnetostatics**
GR accounts for the magnetostatic force
quite simply, the key being the relation,
Length=(G/c^2)*Mass.    , G is Newton's,
Information on sites and regulations07 Jul 2008 12:11 GMT7
Dear Newsgroup:
The following are Basti Newsgroups (sites):
Sci.bio:
http://groups.google.com/group/MBScibio
EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE CONFIRMED -- Blood Vessel Discovered in Mars     Soil07 Jul 2008 11:29 GMT5
<
WE'LL GET TO THE INCREDIBLE NEWS IN A MINUTE

Isn't it ironic that on Friday morning I posted a message
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 June, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.