Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Relativity predicts itself false !!!07 Jul 2008 09:03 GMT34
Too easy they gets away with not answering the question they dont
like !!!
Relativity's is based on the equivalence of gravity and acceleration
So when you say acceleration you say gravity, and when you say
Basti Newsgroups (regulations)06 Jul 2008 17:04 GMT1
Dear Newsgroup:
The following is a sample form for Basti Newsgroups.
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1767039&tstart=0
Until consulted with a lawyer it remains as it is.
New relativity - Curved space different from Accelerated space !!!06 Jul 2008 11:19 GMT6
They force me as we speak - to really want to understand, that curved
space is different from accelerated space
As this Neil, Greg moron in this thread here
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/fd14697d81d05845
They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space06 Jul 2008 09:04 GMT9
The scientists in this thread here
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/110f69ea00b7557e
still as we speak, refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space
I need this very stringently, in order for me to make a comparison
Relativity is a Mystery Science Theater 3000 !!!05 Jul 2008 17:22 GMT2
They have no any concludent answers, they have no answers to
anything.
For instance I beg them to give me a meter cube of curved space, in
order for me to make a comparison and see differences from a normal
An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per     second05 Jul 2008 16:55 GMT42
An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of
zero seconds per second. Furthermore, it would not
be affected by any relativistic time dilation. The higher
the precission,  the slower a clock runs. A clock
"Retic Postings and SPAM"04 Jul 2008 15:24 GMT1
"Retic Postings and SPAM"
    There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic
are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
Happy Fourth of July04 Jul 2008 05:44 GMT2
Dear Newsgroup:
Happy Fourth of July 2008 to you and to our members.
We have variety of articles in mathematics also about Einstein.
Join us:
The Uncertainty Principle04 Jul 2008 04:54 GMT6
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
does seem very sensible
to those of a finite mind
but if we could learn to micro measure without disturbing
Magnetostatics & QED04 Jul 2008 01:33 GMT1
Hi Charles.
For discussion management, I choose to remove
these posts from "Emergence..." Jul 12/08, and
start a new thread. I also appreciate you and I are
New Newsgroups04 Jul 2008 00:48 GMT1
Dear Newsgroup:
The following are Basti Newsgroups:
Sci.math:
http://groups.google.com/group/MBScimath?hl=en
Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich03 Jul 2008 12:13 GMT6
Strich 9 <Strich.9.2b01e2a@physicsbanter.com> wrote in message
 Strich.9.2b01e2a@physicsbanter.com
> Dirk Van de moortel;1175620 Wrote:
>> "Strich 9" Strich.9.2af7567@physicsbanter.com wrote in message
Who is who?03 Jul 2008 03:14 GMT51
Mr. B. wrote:
If you are looking for support, at most you will find paranoid
and/or confused individuals who want to take shelter in your
us-vs.-them state of mind.
Electron acceleration02 Jul 2008 14:30 GMT3
The increments of energy that an electron is given as it accelerates is in
reality determined by the size of the universe.  This is because an electron
is a group of waves of infinite velocity that extend around the 4-sphere
universe.  When the group changes its velocity the ...
Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich02 Jul 2008 08:54 GMT4
"Strich 9" <Strich.9.2aecca7@physicsbanter.com> wrote in message news:Strich.9.2aecca7@physicsbanter.com...

> ok, ok, this is usually the time where most physicists become busy or
> have something better to do, when they realize that further answers to
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 June, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.