| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Relativity predicts itself false !!! | 07 Jul 2008 09:03 GMT | 34 |
Too easy they gets away with not answering the question they dont like !!! Relativity's is based on the equivalence of gravity and acceleration So when you say acceleration you say gravity, and when you say
|
| Basti Newsgroups (regulations) | 06 Jul 2008 17:04 GMT | 1 |
Dear Newsgroup: The following is a sample form for Basti Newsgroups. http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1767039&tstart=0 Until consulted with a lawyer it remains as it is.
|
| New relativity - Curved space different from Accelerated space !!! | 06 Jul 2008 11:19 GMT | 6 |
They force me as we speak - to really want to understand, that curved space is different from accelerated space As this Neil, Greg moron in this thread here http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/fd14697d81d05845
|
| They refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space | 06 Jul 2008 09:04 GMT | 9 |
The scientists in this thread here http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/110f69ea00b7557e still as we speak, refuse to give me a cubic meter of curved space I need this very stringently, in order for me to make a comparison
|
| Relativity is a Mystery Science Theater 3000 !!! | 05 Jul 2008 17:22 GMT | 2 |
They have no any concludent answers, they have no answers to anything. For instance I beg them to give me a meter cube of curved space, in order for me to make a comparison and see differences from a normal
|
| An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second | 05 Jul 2008 16:55 GMT | 42 |
An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second. Furthermore, it would not be affected by any relativistic time dilation. The higher the precission, the slower a clock runs. A clock
|
| "Retic Postings and SPAM" | 04 Jul 2008 15:24 GMT | 1 |
"Retic Postings and SPAM" There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
|
| Happy Fourth of July | 04 Jul 2008 05:44 GMT | 2 |
Dear Newsgroup: Happy Fourth of July 2008 to you and to our members. We have variety of articles in mathematics also about Einstein. Join us:
|
| The Uncertainty Principle | 04 Jul 2008 04:54 GMT | 6 |
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle does seem very sensible to those of a finite mind but if we could learn to micro measure without disturbing
|
| Magnetostatics & QED | 04 Jul 2008 01:33 GMT | 1 |
Hi Charles. For discussion management, I choose to remove these posts from "Emergence..." Jul 12/08, and start a new thread. I also appreciate you and I are
|
| New Newsgroups | 04 Jul 2008 00:48 GMT | 1 |
Dear Newsgroup: The following are Basti Newsgroups: Sci.math: http://groups.google.com/group/MBScimath?hl=en
|
| Finally once more, Special Relativity is Proven False by Seju Strich | 03 Jul 2008 12:13 GMT | 6 |
Strich 9 <Strich.9.2b01e2a@physicsbanter.com> wrote in message Strich.9.2b01e2a@physicsbanter.com
> Dirk Van de moortel;1175620 Wrote: >> "Strich 9" Strich.9.2af7567@physicsbanter.com wrote in message |
| Who is who? | 03 Jul 2008 03:14 GMT | 51 |
Mr. B. wrote: If you are looking for support, at most you will find paranoid and/or confused individuals who want to take shelter in your us-vs.-them state of mind.
|
| Electron acceleration | 02 Jul 2008 14:30 GMT | 3 |
The increments of energy that an electron is given as it accelerates is in reality determined by the size of the universe. This is because an electron is a group of waves of infinite velocity that extend around the 4-sphere universe. When the group changes its velocity the ...
|
| Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False by Seju Strich | 02 Jul 2008 08:54 GMT | 4 |
"Strich 9" <Strich.9.2aecca7@physicsbanter.com> wrote in message news:Strich.9.2aecca7@physicsbanter.com...
> ok, ok, this is usually the time where most physicists become busy or > have something better to do, when they realize that further answers to |