Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Lorentz contraction of spinning ring30 Nov 2008 18:09 GMT56
How does the dimensions of a spinning ring change wrt its angular
velocity?
I would have thought it should Lorentz contracting along its
circumference, yet this would also imply a smaller radius, even though
How long will the relativist Brother-hood stand this ?30 Nov 2008 10:26 GMT6
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories
"
Aether and general relativity
Strange result29 Nov 2008 18:31 GMT27
The relativistic Doppler effect:
f_observed=f_source (1-v/c*cos(theta))/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)
shows that f_observed=f_source for cos(theta)=(1-sqrt(1-(v/c)^2))/(v/
c)
Latest effort on the Gaussian-Type integral29 Nov 2008 16:54 GMT7
The earlier thread was getting too long and turning as well into an
pissing contest as well.  So, I will continue with a new draft on a new
thread.
Charles Francis at SPF pointed out that there was an error in my use of
New knock to geometrical view of gravity29 Nov 2008 14:57 GMT159
I want perturb the existence of uncritical GR students and geometrically
oriented guys with this provocative post :-)
The analysis on the geometrical formulation of gravity done in recent
years by several groups in the world has demonstrated that General
A friendly request to Ken Seto from Uncle Ben29 Nov 2008 06:50 GMT59
Dear Ken,
For weeks now you have been telling me, as we discuss elementary
problems in Specialk Relativiy, that I have been executing the Lorentz
Transformation incorrectly.
Proof that Time Dilation does not exist.28 Nov 2008 22:11 GMT50
Consider a large and stable clock (C1) in space, connected to a very long and
accurately calibrated rod.  At precise intervals of one defined time unit, the
clock emits a brief pulse of light, encoded with its time reading.
Alongside the rod is a stationary observer with another ...
propagation of light28 Nov 2008 14:58 GMT19
If light is emitted at the origins of frames of reference S and
S' when they coincide with S' moving with velocity v relative to S
according to the transformation equations
                      x'=x-vt
Little traveler problem27 Nov 2008 22:15 GMT37
Please excuse the possible stupidity of the question. I am a newbie to
relativity. My question is fairly simple:
A traveler covers the distance between Alpha Centauri and Earth in 120 seconds
(actual distance is ~4.4 light years). I would like to know:
Is it possible to be smarter than a relativist?27 Nov 2008 16:51 GMT14
Tommaso Dorico, a famous particle physics experimentalist,
thinks that to be smarter than a theoretical physicist is
possible and necessary,
http://qd.typepad.com/6/2005/03/be_smarter_than.html
Gravity waves, energy and momentum27 Nov 2008 16:44 GMT102
I"ve heard that "energy conservation fails in GR" and perhaps this is
an example of it.
Gravity waves travel through vacuum, where by definition T = 0 : no
energy or momentum flux.
Do you want to chat with troll Dono about relativity?, try this27 Nov 2008 11:39 GMT7
http://www.geocities.com/albertzotkin/usenet_talk.html
enjoy :-)
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"26 Nov 2008 09:57 GMT20
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
    (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
    The validity of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics seems to be
beyond question. Under the first law, the total energy content of a closed
About " The third Newton's law ".26 Nov 2008 05:01 GMT7
One no imagine story about " The third Newton's law ".
=========..
" The action is equal to counteraction." was the great scientific
discover.
Test2 SPF25 Nov 2008 20:00 GMT34
SPF = Sci.Physics.Foundations.
Hi Charles and Kwan.
As a member of SPF I give the *benefit of the doubt*
to new ideas, such as Kwan's, and your's too Charles.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 October, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.