| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| singularities -unachievable in my lifetime. | 28 Feb 2009 17:01 GMT | 1 |
I don't see how a black hole and/or singularity can be the way the math suggests that it is. Once gravity overcomes the other forces matter begins
|
| A new GToR? | 27 Feb 2009 21:33 GMT | 102 |
GToR =General Theory of Relativty. A null result of LIGO sofar, together with the ambiguous result of GP-b, (which is unlikely to be trusted however the numbers
|
| "The Einstein Hoax" | 27 Feb 2009 17:58 GMT | 3 |
"The Einstein Hoax" (See also our sister website reticsessays.com) The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
|
| Will I age slower when I'm running? | 27 Feb 2009 17:34 GMT | 9 |
I've heard that the theory of relativity says that moving objects will age slower than objects that don't move. So I will stay young when I'm running.
|
| Lorentz Transformation for dummies | 27 Feb 2009 05:20 GMT | 114 |
By persistent, if not popular, request, here is a simple derivation of the Lorentz Transformation in one spatial dimension. Three dimensions would just be more pages of algebra, because the essential points can be made in only one.
|
| Lorentz Transformation for dummies | 27 Feb 2009 02:55 GMT | 32 |
By persistent, if not popular, request, here is a simple derivation of the Lorentz Transformation in one spatial dimension. Three dimensions would just be more pages of algebra, because the essential points can
|
| Closing speed vs relative speed for dummies | 27 Feb 2009 02:53 GMT | 117 |
On Feb 13, 2009, 9:51 am (EST), "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> Snivelling relativistic lying bastard trolls claim that c+v is not the > speed of anything or is a "closing speed", accusing mathematicians |
| The First Postulate of Crank Einstein's Relativity | 26 Feb 2009 23:11 GMT | 19 |
The First Postulate of Crank Einstein's Relativity: "Examples of this sort, (see A below), suggest rather that, (see B below), the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good. We will raise this
|
| Lorentz invariance and the reason why it seems to work | 26 Feb 2009 18:02 GMT | 3 |
The classical action, S, associated with one particle is the number of phase waves (i.e. matter waves) that pass through the particle as it moves from its initial to its final position
|
| Could Mach's Principle be a real force? | 26 Feb 2009 01:47 GMT | 5 |
Machs Principle *************** Mach's principle is defined as inertia originates in a kind of interaction between bodies. (Wikipedia describing Einsteins view of
|
| Unified GR and Quantum Mechanics | 26 Feb 2009 01:20 GMT | 2 |
GR curved spacetime implies a 5th dimension that spacetime curves into The 5th dimension is the line of decreasing probability of alternative realities. Highly improbable realities are canceled by realities similar properties
|
| Understanding Our Universe in MMM | 26 Feb 2009 00:46 GMT | 1 |
Understanding Our Universe in MMM Please find the 1st few pages of my paper on: Theory of Absolute Space and Absolute Time Relativity of Observations and Measurements
|
| For entertainment, NPA has a new website | 25 Feb 2009 17:01 GMT | 6 |
http://www.worldnpa.org/main/ It is quite entertaining
|
| Induction, inductance and absurdities of modern physics | 25 Feb 2009 14:41 GMT | 4 |
Induction, inductance and absurdities of modern physics Two well knonw concepts from electromagnetism are discussed. Actual electromagnetism admits the omnipotence of Maxwell equation to explain all known electric and magnetic phenomena.
|
| Lagrangains with two time deriviatives | 25 Feb 2009 10:29 GMT | 25 |
I am reacquainting myself with field theory from Murrey Spegals free book. In it he mentions for subtle reasons lagrangians are limited to two time derivates. This has left me scratching my head a bit. I know the GR lagrangian has two time deriviatves - but that is only ...
|