Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / February 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
singularities -unachievable in my lifetime.28 Feb 2009 17:01 GMT1
I don't see how a black hole and/or singularity can be the way the
math
suggests that it is. Once gravity overcomes the other forces matter
begins
A new GToR?27 Feb 2009 21:33 GMT102
GToR =General Theory of Relativty.
A null result of LIGO sofar, together with
the ambiguous result of GP-b, (which is
unlikely to be trusted however the numbers
"The Einstein Hoax"27 Feb 2009 17:58 GMT3
"The Einstein Hoax"
    (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
    The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle"
which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
Will I age slower when I'm running?27 Feb 2009 17:34 GMT9
I've heard that the theory of relativity says that moving objects
will age slower than objects that don't move.
So I will stay young when I'm running.
Lorentz Transformation for dummies27 Feb 2009 05:20 GMT114
By persistent, if not popular, request, here is a simple derivation of
the Lorentz Transformation in one spatial dimension. Three dimensions
would just be more pages of algebra, because the essential points can
be made in only one.
Lorentz Transformation for dummies27 Feb 2009 02:55 GMT32
By persistent, if not popular, request, here is a simple derivation
of
the Lorentz Transformation in one spatial dimension. Three dimensions
would just be more pages of algebra, because the essential points can
Closing speed vs relative speed for dummies27 Feb 2009 02:53 GMT117
On Feb 13, 2009, 9:51 am (EST), "Androcles"
<Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> Snivelling relativistic lying bastard trolls claim that c+v is not the
> speed of anything or is a "closing speed",  accusing mathematicians
The First Postulate of Crank Einstein's Relativity26 Feb 2009 23:11 GMT19
The First Postulate of Crank Einstein's Relativity:
"Examples of this sort, (see A below), suggest rather that, (see B below),
the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of
reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good. We will raise this
Lorentz invariance and the reason why it seems to work26 Feb 2009 18:02 GMT3
The classical action, S, associated with one particle
is the number of phase waves (i.e. matter waves) that
pass through the particle as it moves from its initial
to its final position
Could Mach's Principle be a real force?26 Feb 2009 01:47 GMT5
Machs Principle
***************
Mach's principle is defined as inertia originates in a kind of
interaction between bodies. (Wikipedia describing Einsteins view of
Unified GR and Quantum Mechanics26 Feb 2009 01:20 GMT2
GR curved spacetime implies a 5th dimension that spacetime curves into
The 5th dimension is the line of decreasing probability of alternative
realities.
Highly improbable realities are canceled by realities similar properties
Understanding Our Universe in MMM26 Feb 2009 00:46 GMT1
Understanding Our Universe in MMM
Please find the 1st few pages of my paper on:
Theory of Absolute Space and Absolute Time
Relativity of Observations and Measurements
For entertainment, NPA has a new website25 Feb 2009 17:01 GMT6
http://www.worldnpa.org/main/
It is quite entertaining
Induction, inductance and absurdities of modern physics25 Feb 2009 14:41 GMT4
Induction, inductance and absurdities of modern physics
Two well knonw concepts from electromagnetism are discussed.
Actual electromagnetism admits the omnipotence of Maxwell equation to
explain all known electric and magnetic phenomena.
Lagrangains with two time deriviatives25 Feb 2009 10:29 GMT25
I am reacquainting myself with field theory from Murrey Spegals free book.
In it he mentions for subtle reasons lagrangians are limited to two time
derivates.  This has left me scratching my head a bit.  I know the GR
lagrangian has two time deriviatves - but that is only ...
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 January, 2009
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.