Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / March 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Wait oh! - you mean? (was A flawlessly-designed MMX...)31 Mar 2009 22:36 GMT3
Tom Roberts wrote:
> despicabilityhoho wrote:
>> And the reason this amazes so is that it seems extensible to *any*
>> accelerating body, such as a baloon let go by the open stem which
Gauge Relativity Theory31 Mar 2009 20:03 GMT112
Definition of a gauge relativity theory:
1. All the objects in the universe are in a state of absolute motion.
2. A gauge observer does not know his state of absolute motion.
3. A gauge observer arbituary sets his state of absolute motion to be
What if time was constant?31 Mar 2009 14:59 GMT9
Hello relatives,
I always felt the conditions of GR violated common sense. It just
"feels" more natural if time was a constant and the speed of light
varied. So I began to wonder what would relativity theory and
A flawlessly-designed MMX is feasible31 Mar 2009 13:01 GMT18
(test post)
That's what I heard here a couple years ago (my synopsis). I find
that revelation exhilarating, astonishing, and simply earth-shattering.
I trust it meets with widespread agreement among relativists that an
Einstein's geodesic equation?31 Mar 2009 02:07 GMT45
I guess everyone knows the geodesic variational equation,
used by Einstein, which is, using E as an integral sign,
dEds = 0
Does anyone know if this was 'Einstein's equation'? That
Lorentz Transforms of Space and Lorentz Contraction Problem30 Mar 2009 19:46 GMT11
Hey everybody,
I'm new to this newsgroup, so I apologize if it's the wrong one for
this question. If it is, mind pointing me to a better group?
We'll define A to be gamma. We have a lab frame (with coordinates x
paypal payment )( www.315store.com )Air Jordans Air Jordans 1 Air     Jordans 2 Air Jordans 3 Air Jordans 3.5 Air Jordans 4 Air Jordans 4.5 Air     Jordans 5 Air Jordans 6 ( paypal payment )( www.315store.com )Air Jordans 7     Air Jordans 8 Air Jordans 9 Air Jordans 10 Air Jordans 11 Air Jordans 12 Air     Jordans 13 Air Jordans 14 Air Jordans 16 ( paypal payment )( www.315store.com     )Air Jordans 17 Air Jordans 18 Air Jordans 23 Air Jordans DMP Air Jordans     Kids Air Jordans 15.5 Air Jordans 23 women Air Jordans 5 ( paypal payment )(     www.315store.com )women Air Jordans 3.5 women Air Jordans 13 & Air Jordans 23     Air Jordans 13 & Air Jordans 1130 Mar 2009 15:21 GMT1
( paypal payment )( www.315store.com )Air Jordans Air Jordans 1 Air
Jordans 2 Air Jordans 3 Air Jordans 3.5 Air Jordans 4 Air Jordans 4.5
Air Jordans 5 Air Jordans 6 ( paypal payment )( www.315store.com )Air
Jordans 7 Air Jordans 8 Air Jordans 9 Air Jordans 10 Air Jordans 11
Time dialation and Relativity30 Mar 2009 07:15 GMT1
Please ignore the previous question.
B1, B2 and B3 are three boxes such that the size of the B3>B2>B1. B1
is in B2 and B2 is in B3. The speed of B3 = 0.25C. Inside B3 there is
B2, moving with 0.5C wrt B3 and inside B2 there is B1 moving with
question (length contraction)30 Mar 2009 06:01 GMT70
My understanding is that if a spaceship is accelerated and becomes
moving with respect to earth, its length is contracted according to
earth, but according to spaceship the whole universe (including earth)
is contracted in the direction of motion. If this is correct why is
Another Part of the Einstein's Hoax.28 Mar 2009 23:52 GMT79
The Pound Rebka experiment is often quoted as providing supporting evidence for
Einstein's GR theory. Yet its equation for the frequency shift of falling
light, d(nu) = gh/c^2, is identical to that of BaTh, which simply accepts the
reality that light accelerates down a gravity well ...
For the morons Piggy Brown and Bonehead Green that can't read.28 Mar 2009 20:44 GMT2
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/1st/Postulates.htm
Galilean transformation equations28 Mar 2009 03:21 GMT39
x'=x-vt
                           y'=y
                           z'=z
                           t'=t
!very important for your life...27 Mar 2009 17:58 GMT1
!very important for your life...
Excuse me!
Would you stop for a moment?!
O...man...Haven't you thought-one day- about yourself ?
P=NP27 Mar 2009 16:49 GMT5
The purpose of this post is to inform the scientific community that
the present writer resolved the P versus NP problem (for the P=NP
alternative) on October 1985. In the published memory of the ININTEF
Scientific Conference that took place at Capitol (Havana, Cuba) in
Searching for Happiness ?27 Mar 2009 00:45 GMT2
Searching for Happiness ?
Dr. Saleh Abdul Azeez As Sindee
Happiness is a common goal that everyone strives to attain.
Philosophers, intellectuals, doctors and artists alike have all
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 February, 2009
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.