Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / June 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Lorentz Contraction programmed w/ graphics30 Jun 2009 22:03 GMT11
http://www.4shared.com/dir/17166012/1f190735/sharing.html
Excel spreadsheet programmed in
Visual Basic for Applications.
Download and run.  Examine the code and see if it is correct!
General Relativity - Some problems and objections30 Jun 2009 17:22 GMT37
General Relativity - Some problems and objections
__________________________________________
Criticism of the basis of the general relativity theory (1)
Many GRT inconsistencies are well-known:
Lorentz Contraction: Excel graphics and code30 Jun 2009 12:41 GMT12
As a final farewell to the subject of the Lorentz Contraction,
I have programmed a demo in Visual Basic for Excel.  If you have
Microsoft Office or even just Excel, you can download and run
the demo and examine the code.
Quest. about Size of very early Univ. and gravity30 Jun 2009 12:29 GMT2
I'm a layman who is fascinated by Physics. I have a question which
will prove my lack of understanding of Physics. I understand that
Stephen Hawking has been working on trying to get Relativity to "mesh"
with Quantum Mechanics for a long time.
Quantum gravity: some foundational ideas29 Jun 2009 11:02 GMT18
http://knol.google.com/k/albert-zotkin/quantum-gravity/2592crda49l3p/1#
We start with a classical Newtonian gravitational potential
    phi = -GM/r
Now, we integrate it with respect to r to attain
Is its "Domain of Applicability" Real?28 Jun 2009 20:28 GMT14
I've been told many times that Relativity
holds good in its "domain of applicability",
so i should be safe
also, that relativity is The One of the two
Does Relativity play dices ?28 Jun 2009 17:26 GMT5
another thing i dont understand from
our teachers
they tell us, that who are they telling
god not to play dices
"Causality"28 Jun 2009 16:54 GMT1
"Causality"
    (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
    One of the "truths" correctly accepted by the academic community is
"Causality". It states that an effect cannot occur before its cause.
Basis of SR?28 Jun 2009 08:24 GMT89
"Poincaré's work at the Bureau des Longitudes on establishing
international time zones led him to consider how clocks at
rest on the Earth, which would be moving at different speeds
relative to absolute space (or the "luminiferous aether"), could
Einstein's Ellipsoids28 Jun 2009 00:37 GMT26
"Einstein's Ellipsoids"
One of our most prolific contributors to this
newsgroup (s.p.r) has argued that Einstein's SR, first
published in 1905, predicts that a moving object is
GR=>UFT.126 Jun 2009 20:44 GMT10
The ability of General Relativity (GR) to generate a UFT
(electrically) is further confirmed.
Remarkably, this particular solution of the field equations
http://physics.trak4.com/GR_Charge_Couple.pdf
Postscientism: Introducing Idiocies, Heroically Fighting Them25 Jun 2009 23:31 GMT2
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/00/engtot.pdf :
"The Second Law made its appearance in physics around 1850, but a half
century later it was already surrounded by so much confusion that the
British Association for the Advancement of Science decided to appoint a
Michelson-Morley Mythbusted25 Jun 2009 19:12 GMT6
according to the predictors of relativity
the GPS clock is tuned to tick a bit slower
than the required
10.23 MHz to 10.22999999543 MHz
"A Basic Look at the Aether"25 Jun 2009 16:42 GMT1
"A Basic Look at the Aether"
    (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
    Until the start of the 20th century, the fundamental structure of the
Universe was considered to be based upon the claasical Aether. This
Two Schwarzschild radii24 Jun 2009 21:47 GMT119
Two Schwarzschild radii
____________________
The Schwarzschild radius is the distance Rs from the center
of a non-rotating black hole such that, if all the mass
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 May, 2009
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.