Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Source Independency Clearly Requires an Aether31 Jul 2009 23:52 GMT60
Einstein's P2 has two parts. The first says that all observers will measure the
one-way speed of arriving light (if that is possible) as always having the
value c. Of course, this has never been verified.
The second adds that this speed is independent of the relative motion of the
Correct/Incorrect Interpretation of the UP31 Jul 2009 17:04 GMT20
Here is an extract from a well known text, "Quantum Mechanics" by C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu and F. LaLoe:
http://sb635.mystarband.net/cohen.pdf
The plate P which has the slits is conceptually on perfect springs, and the movement of the plate provides a measure of momentum. I
was ...
On the physicality of length contraction31 Jul 2009 15:08 GMT239
The thread "There is no physical length contraction" is getting too
long to be coherent, IMHO, although very interesting.
I would like to focus on the nature of the connection between the two
spaceships in Bell's Spaceship Problem/Paradox:  I believe it has
The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning.31 Jul 2009 10:56 GMT1
The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning.
(What goes DOWN sometimes goes UP)
25 years ago during heavy thunderstorm in the Netherlands, a photo
camera with automatic shutter recorded strange bead lightning streaks
Steve Carlip on comoving coordinates31 Jul 2009 03:13 GMT174
A while back there was a discussion in this newsgroup regarding
Einstein's interpretation of gravity. Steve Carlip forwarded a counter
argument which employed commoving coordinates. I'm hoping someone,
perhaps even Steve if he has the time and inclination, can recall
Length Contraction IS Physical ! ! !30 Jul 2009 23:43 GMT22
sniffing around a bit, i came to
feel the conclusion that
from outside i can empirical measure
1. speed of muon higher than c
Will you participate in this short study?30 Jul 2009 20:02 GMT1
Dear Colleagues and friends,
The University of Minho, in Portugal and Dare Institute in Cambridge,
MA are inviting potential participants from various backgrounds for
an
michelson morley experiment questions30 Jul 2009 03:34 GMT435
I have some questions about the michelson morley experiment that tried
to detect ether.
On this web page http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/michelson.html
it shows some of the mathematics involved in calculating the
Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether???????30 Jul 2009 00:32 GMT298
Whenever this subject is raised, relativists immediately throw a tantrum and
pretend to have some kind of brain seizure. They then quote Einstein's second
postulate as proof that light speed is source dependent, claiming that the
mathematics works and that's all we need to know.  
entropy as an active force29 Jul 2009 05:40 GMT25
I got this idea from watching a sink full of water draining, well,
down the drain. The water formed a spiral pattern. I realized the
spiral structure was created only because that was the most efficient
manner for a large amount of water to drain down a small hole. I
"H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM"28 Jul 2009 16:58 GMT2
"H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM"
    (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
    There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic
are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
What are the spatial dimensions of a *volumeless* object having28 Jul 2009 13:37 GMT31
What are the spatial dimensions of a *volumeless* object having
mass and charge?
If they are zero, how can such object be different from a mathematical
point?
Historical relativity papers28 Jul 2009 07:52 GMT5
Wikisource has a lot of historical papers on Einstein's theory of
special relativity by Michelson, Lorentz, Poincaŕe, etc.. See:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Relativity
For example,
The Addition Operator Absent in Relatvity !!!27 Jul 2009 23:41 GMT40
if i feel right, the predictors at the
Collider dont use the addition in their neutrons
or whatever, because there are no additions in relativity
what is going on here,
Change of gravity in a black hole27 Jul 2009 22:33 GMT25
Assume that modern GR holds. That means that change of gravity will
move at the same speed as the speed of light in vacuum.
Given a black hole and an observer at a safe distance, do the
following experiment: Continuously add mass to the black hole. That
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 June, 2009
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.