| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Source Independency Clearly Requires an Aether | 31 Jul 2009 23:52 GMT | 60 |
Einstein's P2 has two parts. The first says that all observers will measure the one-way speed of arriving light (if that is possible) as always having the value c. Of course, this has never been verified. The second adds that this speed is independent of the relative motion of the
|
| Correct/Incorrect Interpretation of the UP | 31 Jul 2009 17:04 GMT | 20 |
Here is an extract from a well known text, "Quantum Mechanics" by C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu and F. LaLoe: http://sb635.mystarband.net/cohen.pdf The plate P which has the slits is conceptually on perfect springs, and the movement of the plate provides a measure of momentum. I was ...
|
| On the physicality of length contraction | 31 Jul 2009 15:08 GMT | 239 |
The thread "There is no physical length contraction" is getting too long to be coherent, IMHO, although very interesting. I would like to focus on the nature of the connection between the two spaceships in Bell's Spaceship Problem/Paradox: I believe it has
|
| The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning. | 31 Jul 2009 10:56 GMT | 1 |
The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning. (What goes DOWN sometimes goes UP) 25 years ago during heavy thunderstorm in the Netherlands, a photo camera with automatic shutter recorded strange bead lightning streaks
|
| Steve Carlip on comoving coordinates | 31 Jul 2009 03:13 GMT | 174 |
A while back there was a discussion in this newsgroup regarding Einstein's interpretation of gravity. Steve Carlip forwarded a counter argument which employed commoving coordinates. I'm hoping someone, perhaps even Steve if he has the time and inclination, can recall
|
| Length Contraction IS Physical ! ! ! | 30 Jul 2009 23:43 GMT | 22 |
sniffing around a bit, i came to feel the conclusion that from outside i can empirical measure 1. speed of muon higher than c
|
| Will you participate in this short study? | 30 Jul 2009 20:02 GMT | 1 |
Dear Colleagues and friends, The University of Minho, in Portugal and Dare Institute in Cambridge, MA are inviting potential participants from various backgrounds for an
|
| michelson morley experiment questions | 30 Jul 2009 03:34 GMT | 435 |
I have some questions about the michelson morley experiment that tried to detect ether. On this web page http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/michelson.html it shows some of the mathematics involved in calculating the
|
| Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether??????? | 30 Jul 2009 00:32 GMT | 298 |
Whenever this subject is raised, relativists immediately throw a tantrum and pretend to have some kind of brain seizure. They then quote Einstein's second postulate as proof that light speed is source dependent, claiming that the mathematics works and that's all we need to know.
|
| entropy as an active force | 29 Jul 2009 05:40 GMT | 25 |
I got this idea from watching a sink full of water draining, well, down the drain. The water formed a spiral pattern. I realized the spiral structure was created only because that was the most efficient manner for a large amount of water to drain down a small hole. I
|
| "H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM" | 28 Jul 2009 16:58 GMT | 2 |
"H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM" (See also our sister website reticsessays.com) There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
|
| What are the spatial dimensions of a *volumeless* object having | 28 Jul 2009 13:37 GMT | 31 |
What are the spatial dimensions of a *volumeless* object having mass and charge? If they are zero, how can such object be different from a mathematical point?
|
| Historical relativity papers | 28 Jul 2009 07:52 GMT | 5 |
Wikisource has a lot of historical papers on Einstein's theory of special relativity by Michelson, Lorentz, Poincaŕe, etc.. See: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Relativity For example,
|
| The Addition Operator Absent in Relatvity !!! | 27 Jul 2009 23:41 GMT | 40 |
if i feel right, the predictors at the Collider dont use the addition in their neutrons or whatever, because there are no additions in relativity what is going on here,
|
| Change of gravity in a black hole | 27 Jul 2009 22:33 GMT | 25 |
Assume that modern GR holds. That means that change of gravity will move at the same speed as the speed of light in vacuum. Given a black hole and an observer at a safe distance, do the following experiment: Continuously add mass to the black hole. That
|