| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Some basic GR. | 28 Feb 2010 22:36 GMT | 55 |
On Feb 18, 1:57 pm, Mike_Fontenot <mlf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > Dr. Fontenot, > > Would you mind informing me of your age, education and background |
| Solar wind and planetary drift | 28 Feb 2010 19:55 GMT | 7 |
Motion from the solar flow ought to push planetary matter outward in its orbit. Mitch Raemsch
|
| Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything: | 28 Feb 2010 11:32 GMT | - |
Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything: (click link) http://www.amperefitz.com/not.quite.everything.for.a.theory.of.everything.htm Enjoy,
|
| Redundant Mathematical Experience, GPS Application Note | 28 Feb 2010 10:36 GMT | 10 |
you not gonna believe this, but relativity is the only theory i know which gives you no mathematical experience whatsoever tensor left and tensor right, you feel nothing, end of story
|
| Paper Presentation Topics | 28 Feb 2010 08:29 GMT | - |
Paper Presentation Topics. Our database posses huge collection of topics for paper presentations in all areas.
|
| The Implications of the 5th force in Relativity | 28 Feb 2010 08:24 GMT | - |
now that the most of the atom is empty, the whole universe atoms, would fill into the space of a single atom just fine therefore, if bigbang true, the whole universe
|
| Mohs scale of relative hardness. | 28 Feb 2010 07:17 GMT | 3 |
Experimental phycists have a 'hardness' scale, Mohs scale, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohs_scale_of_mineral_hardness Theoreticians would like to define that. (My Old Girl would shapen a knife using a sharpening tool).
|
| Re: What is the disagreement to aether? | 28 Feb 2010 01:55 GMT | 1 |
On Feb 24, 2:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 3:21 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: |
| Falling at a black hole | 28 Feb 2010 00:27 GMT | - |
Redshift and Time ends as fall reaches light speed at the event horizon. Then inside there is even greater gravity strength. This proves that black holes are a theortical failure where GR is violating SR.
|
| Doesn't the interpretation of red/blue spectrum shift violate contancy of speed of light? | 27 Feb 2010 16:47 GMT | 11 |
I need an explanation: It's well known that the fact that most objects in the universe have a spectral signature that is shifted to the 'blue' end of the spectrum is interpreted as proof most objects are moving away from us. Usually
|
| Is there a known inverse position operator q-hat^-1? | 27 Feb 2010 14:58 GMT | 1 |
My query here is in reference to the position operator q-hat, which commutes with the momentum operator p-hat along any single space dimension according to the canonical commutation relationship: [q-hat,p-hat]=i h-bar (1)
|
| Paul Andersen Lies, Contradicts Himself and Rufutes SR in One Post. | 27 Feb 2010 06:57 GMT | 30 |
Yes folks! For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious Norwegian WHALE BLUBBER MEDAL for being the first of his countrymen to prove Einstein wrong.
|
| The second of three Postings from The Missing Symbol | 27 Feb 2010 06:18 GMT | 13 |
The Missing Symbol Posting Two The mathematical symbol that's missing from Einstein's 1905 paper is shown here, and what it physically denotes is explained. It is then
|
| Inertial and Gravitational Mass - Equivalent? | 27 Feb 2010 04:31 GMT | 15 |
In Einstein's book, "Relativity: The Special and General Theory", I quote two paragraphs: "Relying on his knowledge of the gravitational field (as it was discussed in the preceding
|
| Mixet.se® iBank - International Monitoring of Trust ed Investments | 26 Feb 2010 18:19 GMT | - |
Business Development & Marketing Services Google Translate: http://mixet.se http://translate.google.com/#sv|en|http%3A%2F%2Fmixet.se Mixet Financial Information: http://ibank.mixet.se,
|