Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity

As per Newtonian notion of absolute space and time, clocks can be
synchronized in absolute terms such that identical precision atomic
clocks located anywhere within the solar system and in any state of
motion, will read the same time t1 when a standard master clock reads

So I pick up some rando book because I'm out of sh.t to read, it is by
Jerome Drexler. In the preface, he explains that his background is that of
an engineer. His book is self-published, with references that are more from
sh.t like Scientific American than peer reviewed journals. ...

From "General Science Journal" Forum:
On Dec, 27, 2009, 11:24 pm.
Aaron says: 97-98% of a mirror is reflective. That means 2-3% of the
silver is absorbing photons and not reflecting them. This shows that

Riedt’s Trinity of c
A light source moves through space in direction LR. The speed of light
is c, when emitted from the light source perpendicular to the
direction. It is c' when emitted from the front of the source and c''

Einstein's Biggest Blunder - - Wasn't???
a bit more light about it
(click link)
http://www.amperefitz.com/einsteins.blunder.htm

Riedt’s 3 Mirror Interferometer Experiment – R3MIX
                  N
                             | \
Direction of Motion >              |  \

Each and every observer sees the emission of light as if they had a
personal ether . This personal ether, like still air, is stationary
with respect to the observer. Light travels as if it is attached to
this ether and speeds along at a constant velocity to the observer and

(from a discussion in SPF).
On Mar 3, 12:07 pm, Oh No <N...@charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote:

According to the special theory of relativity, the aberration only
depends on the relative velocity v between the observer and the light
from the star.
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-05/2-05.htm

Have you ever wondered how interference can occur between radio receivers
hundreds of kilometres apart? Of course you haven't. You're all too stupid here
to ask important questions like that.
Clearly radio astronomy relies on the fact that EM behaves like a giant

WHAT IS UNCLARIFIED AND WHAT IS INCORRECT
                 IN EINSTEIN AND NEWTON THEORIES
So far by participating in the discussions about the relativity, I
feel a need to do a short enumeration of the wrong and correct parts

In my opinion only massive particles could be positioned, not
massless.
Massless particle does move at speed of light c; so it is unreachable
by whatever observational-frame.. then for this reason each observer

On Mar 7, 2:32 pm, Oh No <N...@charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote:

...

I have a few questions that I would like people's expert input on...
1. Don't the terms "causality" and "determinism" actually mean the
exact same thing? If processes follow the rules of causality, then the
outcomes are also determined, aren't they? People tend not to like