| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| coordinates and equations. | 03 Dec 2008 07:11 GMT | 131 |
This is a simple way to think of coordinates for some of our scientific friends. See, there is an x axis and a y axis and a z axis. So if we have an equation that says x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - c^2t^2 = 0
|
| Looking for Help Calculating a Gaussian-Type Integral | 03 Dec 2008 05:51 GMT | 120 |
Dear friends: In the course of working through a physics "exercise" which I have been discussing in a recent thread at sci.physics.research, I have come across the need to solve a particular Gaussian-type integral. I'd
|
| "The Right Angle Lever Paradox" | 03 Dec 2008 05:48 GMT | 4 |
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox" (See also our sister website reticsessays.com) The "Right Angle Lever Paradox" is a classic construct which is taught in most courses in Special Relativity. As with all paradoxes, it reveals
|
| When a Single Photon Hits a Half Silvered Mirror? | 03 Dec 2008 05:41 GMT | 27 |
Just asking.....what happens? I think it splits in two and each half retains its intrinsic frequency and phase. Or maybe the two halves end up 180 out of phase... Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
|
| Einstein's Second Postulate Violates His First. | 03 Dec 2008 04:47 GMT | 125 |
According to Einstein, the laws of physics are supposed to be the same in all inertial frames..... According to Einstein, all speeds are frame dependent EXCEPT that of light. Apparently experiments involving light speed do not obey the first postulate.
|
| Dirk, the Archetypical Tragic Figure | 03 Dec 2008 04:41 GMT | 15 |
Dirk, being a longtime advocate of special relativity theory, should be glad to show us his SR expertise. Question: Can Dirk justify the steps of Einstein's clock 'synchronization'
|
| PD does not understand SR, Part II | 02 Dec 2008 23:51 GMT | 29 |
This is my assumption for this thread: PD claims to understand the Twin Paradox. If this is true, then PD should be able to tell us why people in different inertial frames age differently when there is
|
| Can Photons have many speed at One Point in Space. | 02 Dec 2008 23:35 GMT | 67 |
It is now pretty obvious that Einstein;s theory is complete nonsense and that light is basically ballistic. It also appears that local 'aether-like' regions exist in which Maxwell's equations prevail to some degree. The question is, how rigidly is light controlled by such regions.
|
| confused with time dilation | 02 Dec 2008 21:53 GMT | 568 |
I get confused with the following. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox It says In his famous work on Special Relativity in 1905, Albert Einstein
|
| Third Draft, Possible Closed Form Solution to Gaussian-Based Integrals with High-Order Field Interactions | 02 Dec 2008 20:13 GMT | 40 |
Below I link a third draft of the effort to obtain a closed form solutions to Gaussians with fields up to fourth order. http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/polynomial-solution-writeup-5.pdf Thanks to Charles Francis and others who helped me navigate through some
|
| Dono we still wait for your proof!!! | 02 Dec 2008 19:28 GMT | 16 |
Dear Sir Dono, today you look specially smart and kindly :-) Most people here think you are an ignorant troll who would post in alt.crackpot, but I explained them that is not right. You are a very smart guy with impressive knowledge of physics.
|
| Michelson and Morley experiment | 02 Dec 2008 05:17 GMT | 1190 |
Has the Michelson and Morley experiment performed having the observer ( light sensor) placed on a different frame of reference that the light source and mirrors?
|
| The real secret of the speed of light | 01 Dec 2008 19:29 GMT | 28 |
Let's analyze this short statement, "A source of light emits a photon in time t_0, ..." This statement as such describes an event that
|
| A guide for students of physics in the art of spin Part 2 | 01 Dec 2008 04:09 GMT | 99 |
In Part 1 I described how authors trying to sell Relativity to a student have a problem in that the 'logical' steps which end up with current belief are inexorably tied in with belief in the aether and today the "aether" is a forbidden word - a despised concept.
|
| Lorentz contraction of spinning ring | 30 Nov 2008 18:09 GMT | 56 |
How does the dimensions of a spinning ring change wrt its angular velocity? I would have thought it should Lorentz contracting along its circumference, yet this would also imply a smaller radius, even though
|