Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
BUSH ADMINISTRATION DOCTORED SCIENTISTS' REPORTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE31 Jan 2007 23:26 GMT2
Bush administration accused of doctoring scientists' reports on climate change
o  Inconvenient conclusions censored, hearing told
o  Researchers warned not to talk about global warming
By Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)31 Jan 2007 20:29 GMT34
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT):
IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the equations of IRT are
valid in all environments, including gravity.
IRT has an unlimited domain of applicability therfore it is also valid for
Tom Potter and Original Sources31 Jan 2007 19:41 GMT10
Tom Potter wrote:
I point out your errors, from original sources,
and you just repeat your lies.I point out your errors, from original
sources,
Quantum Gravity 83.8 More on Mass/Energy31 Jan 2007 17:39 GMT2
>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@comcast.net
Let's look at:
1) E = K.E. + P.E.
the classical "energy equals kinetic energy plus potential
Graduate Level Math Books For Sale31 Jan 2007 15:29 GMT1
I thought some people on this group might be interested in taking some
of my used graduate math books off my hands.  I was a graduate student
at Berkeley in Mathematics a few years ago and during that time I
collected a bunch of graduate level math books that I no longer need.
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"31 Jan 2007 15:00 GMT1
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
    When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High Energy
experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy products. As
an example, a proton and an anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent
t-butanol vs. n-butanol melting vs. boiling points31 Jan 2007 14:34 GMT1
Can someone explain why t-butanol has a higher melting point but lower
boiling point than n-butanol?
I know t-butanol is more soluble in water because the hydroxy group
is more localized in the molecule allowing for h-bonding between water
c-v|c+v31 Jan 2007 13:45 GMT6
--------------------------------------
|0+v =>     <= c-v|c+v =>     <= 0-v|
--------------------------------------
|c+v =>     <= 0-v|0+v =>     <= c-v|
Interval before Nuclear Decay31 Jan 2007 09:00 GMT11
My background in physics comes from Nuclear Power School in the Navy
(back in the early 1970's).  The Navy sent me to school so that I
could operate an S5W nuclear propulsion plant (not alone, of course).
So, since the '70's anything more that I've learned about nuclear
Steorn Energy Device31 Jan 2007 02:46 GMT39
What do you think of it? They claim they have a magnetic motor that puts
out more energy than it takes to run it, and they are asking for
scientists to test it for them.
I wonder why they don't rent a hall and set up their machine to power a
Foreign atoms trigger superconductivity in carbon31 Jan 2007 00:48 GMT2
  Foreign atoms trigger superconductivity in carbon (Aug 30)
  http://physicsweb.org/article/news/9/8/18
   Bulk quantities of a new carbon-based superconductor have been made by
   physicists in France. Known as CaC6, the material contains "foreign"
Why Is A Magic Mirror Like A Parsimonious Telephoner?30 Jan 2007 23:48 GMT2
Because they both reverse the charges!
Quantum Gravity 83.7: Negative Mass Fundamental?30 Jan 2007 21:00 GMT1
>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@comcast.net
Before proceeding, I have to mention that whatever
Google did in its recent "rearrangement", I can no longer
reply to readers because my terminal screen only shows
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 810   30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi30 Jan 2007 20:18 GMT2
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 810   30 January 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Turner
Brinton, and Davide Castelvecchi                     www.aip.org/pnu
Why only gravity is "geometrical"?30 Jan 2007 20:06 GMT20
hey ho!
What is the obstruction to developing a theory of - for example -
electromagnetism, that would imply that electromagnetism is not a real
force (like gravity in general relativity)?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.