| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| enthalpy and desiccants | 31 Mar 2007 23:20 GMT | 2 |
I'm working on a liquid desiccant dehumidifier. The way that would work is that a calcium chloride brine is sprayed through humid air absorbing moisture. Later that solution is reconcentrated (regenerated) by spraying the brine through hot air driving off the moisture in the ...
|
| Concerning the Uncertainty Principal | 31 Mar 2007 23:01 GMT | 2 |
I have a question that I am sure has a very simple answer but it has begged me for some time now. As I learn about the quandary of precision of position and velocity measurements with the light on electrons, I was wondering why one could not use two high frequency
|
| String theory is a symptom of a deep problem | 31 Mar 2007 22:47 GMT | 4 |
Mathematicians lie. They lie routinely but they do it in a way that works to keep them in business by lying in areas where they cannot easily be checked objectively--so they can just claim arguments are correct even when they are not--and they're seeding their corruption
|
| Highest Acoustic Atmospheric Frequency? | 31 Mar 2007 22:28 GMT | 10 |
What is the highest-frequency of ultrasound that can propagate through air on earth's atmosphere? Thanks in advance, Radium
|
| Eiffel -a PRogramming Language kills. | 31 Mar 2007 21:19 GMT | 19 |
A for as the logcial loopie. I was trying to find a new programming language and reviewed the language called ? If you are familiar with it you know of the question. Why have self
|
| My Double Propeller Idea -mOre Design Woes | 31 Mar 2007 21:02 GMT | 2 |
Well my latest test trial was another failure of design. Design is hard work, because I have to jury rig a system and not make one without cost consideration. I tried some fishing line between the new trolley and the scale. It all streched. And bounced.
|
| "The Einstein Hoax" | 31 Mar 2007 17:30 GMT | 1 |
"The Einstein Hoax" The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether Theory) to
|
| A Question for Serious Theorectical Students | 31 Mar 2007 14:58 GMT | 2 |
A bottle cap theory. Here is a short theory to consider: A seal as the force maintained as opposed to the force of the pressure. Applied force to the cap seal is maintained by the crimp in
|
| A Question for Serious Theorectical Students | 31 Mar 2007 14:54 GMT | 1 |
A bottle cap theory. Here is a short theory to consider: A seal as the force maintained as opposed to the force of the pressure. Applied force to the cap seal is maintained by the crimp in
|
| Non-unique-valued nature of Lorentz transforms | 31 Mar 2007 14:08 GMT | 10 |
Dear Colleagues, Some time ago we had a hot discussion on other forum, whether it is legal to apply the Lorentz transforms to pass from one inertial frame to another. Our colleagues strongly disagreed with the fact that the
|
| I will rebuild physics from the ground up, as promised. | 31 Mar 2007 13:44 GMT | 8 |
2 years ago I stated that I intended to destroy physics and rebuild it in a form more suiting my tastes, and that is exactly what I intend to do. I dont really give a sh.t either, whether you like it or not, I do not care. I do not care because it is a pointless excercise in ...
|
| Greenhouse Physics | 31 Mar 2007 10:59 GMT | 3 |
In about 1767 Swiss physicist Horace-Bénédict de Saussure invented an elaborate glass enclosure whose interior became very hot when it was exposed to direct sunlight. In about 1824 French mathematician and physicist Jean Baptiste Joseph
|
| Stupid Question | 31 Mar 2007 05:33 GMT | 9 |
I, a high school drop-out, have been nagged for years by the following: Let's say that the earth started spinning really fast on it's axis. So fast that we all flew off because of centripetal force. What would it have to be spinning relative to in order for this to happen?
|
| Quantum Gravity 111.4: Physicists Weren't That Good At Vector Analysis Either | 31 Mar 2007 04:40 GMT | 4 |
>From Osher Doctorow Another justification for physicists' doing away with probability and force (not to mention logic) in Quantum Field Theory is the claim that vector fields do not allow point masses or point particles, which
|
| Pi with bad calculator | 31 Mar 2007 04:05 GMT | 20 |
While vacationing in the Ozarks you're stuck with a little piece of grocery store calculator whose extravagance doesn't go beyond a mere square root button. But you're doing a back of the envelope
|