| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Where do atoms go? | 12 Jul 2008 00:02 GMT | 15 |
Water is H2O - that is one atom of oxygen bound to two atoms of hydrogen. It's raining and there's a big puddle on the pavement. The sun comes out and the water evaporates. The water goes but what happens to the water's atoms? Do all atoms cease to exist when water
|
| The problems with a "constant" speed | 11 Jul 2008 23:59 GMT | 221 |
The speed of light is simply a speed. It is 186,000 miles per second. How can any speed be not a relative speed? What makes 186,000 miles per second immune
|
| Unity between Relativity & Quantum Mechanics? | 11 Jul 2008 23:31 GMT | 5 |
Premise/ Posulate Light cones are in fact geometrical boundaries of the universe. We are in a geometrically closed/boarded space relative to time and the spatial dimensions. since nothing limits extra dimensions including
|
| Cosmic Inflation and Dark Energy: | 11 Jul 2008 22:16 GMT | 17 |
Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that brings about an exponential ( superluminal) expansion of the nascent universe. I propose that this inflation was in fact produced by the
|
| Casimir effect and Lorentz contraction | 11 Jul 2008 20:48 GMT | 1 |
Casimir effect: F = -c A / r^4 where A = area of each parallel plate and c is some positive constant; r is the separation between the plates. We begin wtih both plates 10 nm apart. The pressure is then close to 1
|
| energy creation | 11 Jul 2008 20:06 GMT | 35 |
This redunctant view of the universe was espoused by steady state cosmology. The obvious question raised, if we support a view that energy isn't created, is when did the universe stop creating matter \energy? and what mechanism caused this to happen?
|
| The Correct Solution to the Pole and the Barn Paradox | 11 Jul 2008 19:13 GMT | 179 |
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) provides the following correct solutions to the Pole and the Barn Paradox: 1. The physical length of the pole = 80 meters. This length is the same as the proper length of the pole in the frame of the pole. The
|
| Large Hadron Collider = end of the world? | 11 Jul 2008 19:07 GMT | 1 |
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/11/something-else-to-worry-about/ PRUDEN: Something else to worry about Wesley Pruden (Contact) Friday, July 11, 2008
|
| Casimir effect and Lorentz contraction | 11 Jul 2008 16:53 GMT | 2 |
Casimir effect: F = -c A / r^4 where A = area of each parallel plate and c is some positive constant; r is the separation between the plates. We begin wtih both plates 10 nm apart. The pressure is then close to 1
|
| Planck's Constant for protons | 11 Jul 2008 12:51 GMT | 7 |
This article makes rigorous definitions of a few constants, and discusses what physical properties should be considered invariant. Let us consider a system composed of one electron and one proton. 1. Let M(P) = the mass of the proton.
|
| "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?" | 11 Jul 2008 12:42 GMT | 1 |
"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?" One of the basic beliefs of modern physics is that the velocity of light is the same wherever and whenever it is measured. It is, in the language of physics, invariant. To illustrate this understanding, let us
|
| Physicists don't deliver | 11 Jul 2008 05:07 GMT | 290 |
I used to admire physicists in a big way for their big ideas and fascinating concepts. These days they just seem like nutty professors and bullshit artists to me. They are the big talkers that never deliver on much. The daydreamers that don't seem to ever give you a
|
| Here's one for UA | 11 Jul 2008 00:10 GMT | 1 |
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2008/07/is_black_hole_a.html#Intro
|
| Black holes and mathematical absurdity | 10 Jul 2008 22:22 GMT | 131 |
Any math of a theory that goes nonsense is the proof that such a thing cannot exist. Black holes are known to be mathemtical nonsense. Therefore they cannot exist in reality. There is no such thing as a singularity beyond the Big Bang.
|
| EM pollution threatens with breakdown of Earth's magnetic field | 10 Jul 2008 22:01 GMT | 36 |
Apart from potentially confusing bees and causing them to die having lost orientation, exponentially growing magnetic pollution from cellphones and other sources of EM field could cause the breakdown of Earth's natural magnetic field.
|