Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Where do atoms go?12 Jul 2008 00:02 GMT15
Water is H2O -  that is one atom of oxygen bound to two atoms of
hydrogen. It's raining and there's a big puddle on the pavement. The
sun comes out and the water evaporates.  The water goes but what
happens to the water's atoms? Do all atoms cease to exist when water
The problems with a "constant" speed11 Jul 2008 23:59 GMT221
The speed of light is simply a speed.
It is 186,000 miles per second.
How can any speed be not a relative speed?
What makes 186,000 miles per second immune
Unity between Relativity & Quantum Mechanics?11 Jul 2008 23:31 GMT5
Premise/ Posulate
Light cones are in fact geometrical boundaries of the universe. We are
in a geometrically closed/boarded space relative to time and the
spatial dimensions. since nothing limits extra dimensions including
Cosmic Inflation and Dark Energy:11 Jul 2008 22:16 GMT17
Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or
field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that
brings about an exponential ( superluminal) expansion of the nascent
universe. I propose that this inflation was in fact produced by the
Casimir effect and Lorentz contraction11 Jul 2008 20:48 GMT1
Casimir effect: F = -c A / r^4 where A = area of each parallel plate
and c is some positive constant; r is the separation between the
plates.
We begin wtih both plates 10 nm apart. The pressure is then close to 1
energy creation11 Jul 2008 20:06 GMT35
This redunctant view of the universe was espoused by steady state
cosmology. The obvious question raised, if we support a view that
energy isn't created, is when did the universe stop creating matter
\energy? and what mechanism caused this to happen?
The Correct Solution to the Pole and the Barn Paradox11 Jul 2008 19:13 GMT179
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) provides the following correct
solutions to the Pole and the Barn Paradox:
1. The physical length of the pole = 80 meters. This length is the
same as the proper length of the pole in the frame of the pole. The
Large Hadron Collider = end of the world?11 Jul 2008 19:07 GMT1
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/11/something-else-to-worry-about/
PRUDEN: Something else to worry about
Wesley Pruden (Contact)
Friday, July 11, 2008
Casimir effect and Lorentz contraction11 Jul 2008 16:53 GMT2
Casimir effect: F = -c A / r^4 where A = area of each parallel plate
and c is some positive constant; r is the separation between the
plates.
We begin wtih both plates 10 nm apart. The pressure is then close to 1
Planck's Constant for protons11 Jul 2008 12:51 GMT7
This article makes rigorous definitions of a few constants,
and discusses what physical properties should be considered invariant.
Let us consider a system composed of one electron and one proton.
1. Let M(P) = the mass of the proton.
"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"11 Jul 2008 12:42 GMT1
"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
    One of the basic beliefs of modern physics is that the velocity of
light is the same wherever and whenever it is measured. It is, in the
language of physics, invariant. To illustrate this understanding, let us
Physicists don't deliver11 Jul 2008 05:07 GMT290
I used to admire physicists in a big way for their big ideas and
fascinating concepts. These days they just seem like nutty professors
and bullshit artists to me. They are the big talkers that never
deliver on much. The daydreamers that don't seem to ever give you a
Here's one for UA11 Jul 2008 00:10 GMT1
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2008/07/is_black_hole_a.html#Intro
Black holes and mathematical absurdity10 Jul 2008 22:22 GMT131
Any math of a theory that goes nonsense is the proof that such a thing
cannot exist. Black holes are known to be mathemtical nonsense.
Therefore they cannot exist in reality. There is no such thing as a
singularity beyond the Big Bang.
EM pollution threatens with breakdown of Earth's magnetic field10 Jul 2008 22:01 GMT36
Apart from potentially confusing bees and causing them to die having
lost orientation, exponentially growing magnetic pollution from
cellphones and other sources of EM field could cause the breakdown of
Earth's natural magnetic field.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 June, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.