| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Quantum Gravity 330.6: [Dxx(f)]/f For f Probability Density Functions | 17 Jul 2009 09:07 GMT | 1 |
From Osher Doctorow Since [Dxx(f)]/f seems to be of critical importance for Quantum Gravity and/or Unification, lets look at it for f the probability density function (pdf) of some important continuous probability
|
| THE END OF SCIENCE? | 17 Jul 2009 08:33 GMT | 20 |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/jun/22/end-science-unified-theory-ma vericks "Are we witnessing the end of science?.....Progress in science needs researchers who are not afraid – or who are encouraged and rewarded – to ask awkward and difficult questions of theory and of ...
|
| Gravity is a result of matter interacting with an omnidirectional flow. | 17 Jul 2009 04:58 GMT | 10 |
Matter absorbs energy at a constant rate. It must, to continue to exist, because it *does* require energy to move electrons. This creates the sink we know of as 'gravity'.
|
| Taming supervolcanoes | 17 Jul 2009 03:15 GMT | 3 |
Three of these are in the USA , the source of much of the trouble in the world today! Could we not tap the heat of the yellowstone magna , push cold water or thermocouples into the magma and then draw out the heat so
|
| simple force/mass question | 17 Jul 2009 02:59 GMT | 2 |
Given F=ma, does force define mass or does mass define force? I cannot figure this out. I could start by taking an object, weighing it, divide by gravity and get the mass. Then I can use this mass in F=ma
|
| PING - franklinhu | 16 Jul 2009 23:29 GMT | 1 |
In a response to a post of yours a couple of months ago I gave some clues which might simplify visualizing how rotation curves work. One of those was wrong: Gravity inside a uniform, flat ring of matter *does not cancel out*. It does near the middle of a long, hollow tube,
|
| Matter waves vs Photon | 16 Jul 2009 18:55 GMT | 11 |
Hi folks.., For the last few days, I'm confusing a lot about Light. I hope with this post and with the help of your replies everything would be clear.
|
| And now for something completely different ... . | 16 Jul 2009 18:28 GMT | 3 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SovkqRVsim8&feature=related -- UncleEnglish
|
| ARCTIC IMAGES DECLASSIFIED | 16 Jul 2009 16:16 GMT | 3 |
ARCTIC IMAGES DECLASSIFIED http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/45557/title/Arctic_images_declassified High-resolution photos could provide detailed information about changes in sea ice By Jenny Lauren Lee
|
| Quantum Gravity 330.5: Sturmian Sequences and Probable Causation/Influence (PI) | 16 Jul 2009 15:38 GMT | 1 |
From Osher Doctorow Take a look at Jean-Paul Allouche and Amy Glen's "Extremal properties of (Epi) Sturmian sequences as distributions modulo 1," arXiv: 0907.2430 v1 [math.NT] 14 Jul 2009.
|
| Cannibal war robots eating your dead grandma | 16 Jul 2009 14:55 GMT | 3 |
Yes, the future is now! Imagine Autonomous war robots roaming the land, stopping to eat a dead body they may come across for fuel to keep going, possibly for years. Sounds like a Terminator movie? Nope, it's real world stuff:
|
| Electric potential versus voltage | 16 Jul 2009 11:53 GMT | 3 |
The following reviews some conflicts between electrostatic potential and voltage. 1. ELECTRIC POTENTIAL ENERGY in series capacitors is the same as within isolated capacitors.
|
| I am done with blithering impotently about everything | 16 Jul 2009 04:50 GMT | 1 |
I am done with blithering impotently about everything. From this day forth, I shall blither impotently about nothing.
|
| Why do things have to age slower in time? | 16 Jul 2009 01:49 GMT | 15 |
A galactic neutron star ages slower and is younger than the rest of the universe. Why do things in the universe stay younger than others? Mitch Raemsch
|
| Inductance versus permeability | 16 Jul 2009 01:44 GMT | 1 |
Inductance and permeability both relate magnetic flux to current. Inductance (L) of a wire loop is a function of '# OF TURNS' (N) and current (i). L = N * magnetic flux / i (1)
|